Literature DB >> 14714578

Differing anti-proteinuric action of candesartan and losartan in chronic renal disease.

Hiroto Matsuda1, Koichi Hayashi, Koichiro Homma, Kyoko Yoshioka, Takeshi Kanda, Ichiro Takamatsu, Satoru Tatematsu, Shu Wakino, Takao Saruta.   

Abstract

It has becoming clear that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) show varying levels of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocking activity. Although the duration of activity and the efficacy on blood pressure of ARB are reported to vary, depending on the agents used, it has not been examined whether the effects on proteinuria and urinary nitrite/nitrate (NOx) excretion differ in hypertensive patients with chronic renal disease. In the present study, patients with hypertension (> 140 and/or 90 mmHg) and chronic renal disease (proteinuria > 0.5g/day; serum creatinine < 265 micromol/l or creatinine clearance > 30 ml/min/1.72 m2) were randomly assigned to perindopril- (n = 15), trandolapril- (n = 15), candesartan- (n = 17), and losartan-treated groups (n = 15), and were followed up for 96 weeks. All agents decreased blood pressure to the same level, and none of them had any effect on creatinine clearance. Candesartan, perindopril, and trandolapril reduced proteinuria markedly (from 3.0 +/- 0.6 to 1.8 +/- 0.5 g/day, 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.6 +/- 0.4 g/day, and 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.7 +/- 0.4 g/day, respectively) at 12 weeks, and the beneficial effect persisted throughout the study. The effect of losartan, however, diminished over the study period. Whereas perindopril, trandolapril, and candesartan markedly increased urinary NOx excretion (from 257 +/- 23 to 1,011 +/- 150 micromol/day, 265 +/- 70 to 986 +/- 130 micromol/day, and 260 +/- 62 to 967 +/- 67 micromol/day at 12 weeks, respectively), a relatively blunted increase was observed with losartan (from 309 +/- 42 to 596 +/- 64 micromol/day). In conclusion, renal action of ARB varies, with relatively less proteinuria-sparing, as well as NOx-enhancing, effects observed with candesartan showing the greatest reduction of proteinuria and greatest enhancement of NOx. Furthermore, renal nitric oxide may contribute to the renal protective action of these agents when administered to patients with chronic renal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14714578     DOI: 10.1291/hypres.26.875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure.

Authors:  Helmy M Siragy
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  A small difference in the molecular structure of angiotensin II receptor blockers induces AT₁ receptor-dependent and -independent beneficial effects.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujino; Shin-ichiro Miura; Yoshihiro Kiya; Yukio Tominaga; Yoshino Matsuo; Sadashiva S Karnik; Keijiro Saku
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Do all angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers have the same beneficial effects?

Authors:  S Miura; K Saku
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  TMAO Suppresses Megalin Expression and Albumin Uptake in Human Proximal Tubular Cells Via PI3K and ERK Signaling.

Authors:  Stefania Kapetanaki; Ashok Kumar Kumawat; Katarina Persson; Isak Demirel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.