BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave coagulation therapy (MCT) have been gaining acceptance as a standard method in the management strategy of liver cancer, for reasons of minimally invasive techniques and effective results. We present our experience of RFA and MCT in patients with liver cancer, and analyze retrospectively the advantages and disadvantages of both of the percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients (23 men and 9 women) with 19 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), 12 metastatic liver cancers, and recurrent cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC), were enrolled in this study. Out of these 32 patients, as a prior laparotomy, 19 underwent hepatectomy, colectomy, gastrectomy or cholecystectomy, and 15 were treated with the laparoscopic approach, 17 treated with the percutaneous approach, and 2 treated with the combined approach of those two. All of these procedures were carried out under general anesthesia with ultrasound guidance. Seven and 30 days after these procedures, an assessment helical computed tomography was done. RESULTS: No sign of the residual tissues was noted in all patients except only one case. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous approach was thought to be a more practical and less invasive method regardless previous laparotomy. For the laparoscopic approach, tumors located at the hepatic surface or margin were preferable candidates.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave coagulation therapy (MCT) have been gaining acceptance as a standard method in the management strategy of liver cancer, for reasons of minimally invasive techniques and effective results. We present our experience of RFA and MCT in patients with liver cancer, and analyze retrospectively the advantages and disadvantages of both of the percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients (23 men and 9 women) with 19 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), 12 metastatic liver cancers, and recurrent cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC), were enrolled in this study. Out of these 32 patients, as a prior laparotomy, 19 underwent hepatectomy, colectomy, gastrectomy or cholecystectomy, and 15 were treated with the laparoscopic approach, 17 treated with the percutaneous approach, and 2 treated with the combined approach of those two. All of these procedures were carried out under general anesthesia with ultrasound guidance. Seven and 30 days after these procedures, an assessment helical computed tomography was done. RESULTS: No sign of the residual tissues was noted in all patients except only one case. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous approach was thought to be a more practical and less invasive method regardless previous laparotomy. For the laparoscopic approach, tumors located at the hepatic surface or margin were preferable candidates.
Authors: E Felekouras; I Papaconstantinou; E Pikoulis; M Kontos; S Georgopoulos; A Papalois; T Diamantis; J Bramis; E Papalambros; E Bastounis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Thomas J Vogl; Parviz Farshid; Nagy N N Naguib; Abbas Darvishi; Babak Bazrafshan; Emmanuel Mbalisike; Thorsten Burkhard; Stephan Zangos Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Bo La Yun; Jeong Min Lee; Ji Hyun Baek; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Hyun Pyo Hong; Jee Youn Lee; Mi Yeon Lee; Kyung Uk Jung; Byung Ik Kim; Byung Ho Son; Jun Ho Shin; Sung Ryol Lee Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2020-05-10 Impact factor: 1.195