Literature DB >> 14713738

Quantifying income-related inequality in healthcare delivery in the United States.

Alex Y Chen1, José J Escarce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have found that high-income Americans use more medical care than their low-income counterparts, irrespective of medical "need." The methods employed in these studies, however, make it difficult to evaluate differences in the degree of income-related inequality in utilization across population subgroups. In this study, we derive a summary index to quantify income-related inequality in need-adjusted medical care expenditures and report values of the index for adults and children in the United States.
METHODS: We used the summary index of income-related inequality in expenditures developed by Wagstaff et al. 1 The source of data for the study was the Household Component of the 1996-1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which contains person-level data on medical care expenditures, demographic characteristics, household income, and a wide array of health status measures. We used multivariate regression analysis to predict need-adjusted annual medical care expenditures per person by income level and used the predictions to calculate the indices of inequality. Separate indices were calculated for all adults, working-age adults, seniors, and children ages 5 to 17.
RESULTS: For all age groups, predicted expenditures per person, adjusted for medical need, generally increased as income rose. The index of inequality for all adults was +0.087 (95% confidence interval, +0.035, +0.139); for working-age adults, +0.099 (+0.046, +0.152); for seniors, +0.147 (+0.059, +0.235); and for children, +0.067 (+0.006, +0.128).
CONCLUSIONS: There exists income-related inequality in medical care expenditures in the United States, and it favors the wealthy. The inequality is highest among seniors despite Medicare, intermediate among working-age adults, and lowest among children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14713738     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103526.13935.b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  Measuring socioeconomic differences in use of health care services by wealth versus by income.

Authors:  Sara Allin; Cristina Masseria; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Managing care? Medicare managed care and patient use of cardiologists.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Factors associated with variations in hospital expenditures for acute heart failure in the United States.

Authors:  Boback Ziaeian; Puza P Sharma; Tzy-Chyi Yu; Katherine Waltman Johnson; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Differences in income-related inequality and horizontal inequity in ambulatory care use between rural and non-rural areas: using the 1998-2001 U.S. National Health Interview Survey data.

Authors:  Hosung Shin; Jinsook Kim
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2010-07-02

5.  Alcohol consumption in older adults and Medicare costs.

Authors:  Kenneth J Mukamal; Thomas Lumley; Russell V Luepker; Pauline Lapin; Murray A Mittleman; A Marshall McBean; Rosa M Crum; David S Siscovick
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2006

6.  The impact of Medicare part D on income-related inequality in pharmaceutical expenditure.

Authors:  Natalie Carvalho; Dennis Petrie; Linkun Chen; Joshua A Salomon; Philip Clarke
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-04-16

7.  Poverty, wealth, and health care utilization: a geographic assessment.

Authors:  Richard A Cooper; Matthew A Cooper; Emily L McGinley; Xiaolin Fan; J Thomas Rosenthal
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Health outcomes in patients using no-prescription online pharmacies to purchase prescription drugs.

Authors:  Theodore J Cicero; Matthew Stephen Ellis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Design and methodology of the Geo-social Analysis of Physicians' settlement (GAP-Study) in Germany.

Authors:  David A Groneberg; Michael Boll; Jan Bauer
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Variations in diagnostic testing utilization in Italy: Secondary analysis of a national survey.

Authors:  Pamela Barbadoro; Antonella D'Alleva; Sara Galmozzi; Gemma Zocco; Francesco Di Stanislao; Emilia Prospero; Marcello Mario D'Errico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.