Literature DB >> 14713086

Validation of target volume and position in respiratory gated CT planning and treatment.

Sui Shen1, Jun Duan, John B Fiveash, Ivan A Brezovich, Brian A Plant, Sharon A Spencer, Richard A Popple, Prem N Pareek, James A Bonner.   

Abstract

The capability of a commercial respiratory gating system based on video tracking of reflective markers to reduce motion-induced CT planning and treatment errors was evaluated. Spherical plastic shells (2.8-82 cm3), simulating the gross target volume (GTV), were placed in a water-filled body phantom that was moved sinusoidally along the longitudinal axis of the CT scanner and the accelerator for +/- 1 cm at 15-30 cycle/min. During gated CT imaging, the x-ray exposure was initiated by the gating system shortly before the end of expiration (so that the imaging time would be centered at the end of expiration); it was terminated by the scanner after completion of each slice. In nongated CT images, the target appeared distorted and often broken up. GTVs volume errors ranged 16%-110% in axial scans, and 7%-36% in spiral scans. In gated CT images, the spheres appeared 3 and 5 mm longer than their actual diameters (volume errors 2%-16%), at the respective respiration rates of 15 and 20 cycles/min. At 30 cycles/min the target appeared 1 cm longer, and volume error ranged 25%-53%. During treatment, gating kept the beam on for a duration equal to the CT acquisition time of 1 s/slice. The difference in positional errors between gated CT and portal films was 1 mm, regardless the size of residual motion errors. Because of the potential of suboptimal placement of the gating window between CT imaging and treatment, an extra 1.5-2.5 mm safety margin can be added regardless of the size of residual motion error. For respiratory rates > or = 30 cycles/min, the effectiveness of gating is limited by large residual motion in the 1 s CT acquisition time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14713086     DOI: 10.1118/1.1626121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Motion management strategies and technical issues associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of thoracic and upper abdominal tumors: A review from NRG oncology.

Authors:  Edward D Brandner; Indrin J Chetty; Tawfik G Giaddui; Ying Xiao; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Measurement of time delay for a prospectively gated CT simulator.

Authors:  M Goharian; R F H Khan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-04

3.  Dosimetric and motion analysis of margin-intensive therapy by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John H Heinzerling; Ross Bland; John C Mansour; Roderich E Schwarz; Ezequiel Ramirez; Chuxiong Ding; Ramzi Abdulrahman; Thomas P Boike; Timothy Solberg; Robert D Timmerman; Jeffrey J Meyer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Intrafractional setup errors in patients undergoing non-invasive fixation using an immobilization system during hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors.

Authors:  Meguru Watanabe; Hiroshi Onishi; Kengo Kuriyama; Takafumi Komiyama; Kan Marino; Masayuki Araya; Ryo Saito; Shinichi Aoki; Yoshiyasu Maehata; Rihito Tominaga; Jitsuhiko Oguri; Naoki Sano; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Reproducibility of target volumes generated using uncoached 4-dimensional CT scans for peripheral lung cancer.

Authors:  Ylanga G van der Geld; Frank J Lagerwaard; John R van Sörnsen de Koste; Johan P Cuijpers; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Gated Radiotherapy Development and its Expansion.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Keikhai Farzaneh; Mehdi Momennezhad; Shahrokh Naseri
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.