Literature DB >> 14713050

Agricultural adjuvants: acute mortality and effects on population growth rate of Daphnia pulex after chronic exposure.

John D Stark1, William K Walthall.   

Abstract

Acute and chronic toxicity of eight agricultural adjuvants (Bond, Kinetic, Plyac, R-11, Silwet L-77, Sylgard 309, X-77, and WaterMaxx) to Daphnia pulex were evaluated with 48-h acute lethal concentration estimates (LC50) and a 10-d population growth-rate measurement, the instantaneous rate of increase (r1). Based on LC50, the order of toxicity was R-11 > X-77 = Sylgard 309 = Silwet L-77 > Kinetic > Bond > Plyac > WaterMaxx; all LC50 estimates were higher than the expected environmental concentration (EEC) of 0.79 mg/L, indicating that none of these adjuvants should cause high levels of mortality in wild D. pulex populations. Extinction, defined as negative population growth rate, occurred after exposure to 0.9 mg/L R-11, 13 mg/L X-77, 25 mg/L Kinetic, 28 mg/L Silwet, 18 mg/L Sylgard, 450 mg/L Bond, 610 mg/L Plyac, and 1,600 mg/L WaterMaxx. Concentrations that caused extinction were substantially below the acute LC50 for R-11, Kinetic, Plyac, X-77, and Bond. The no-observable-effects concentration (NOEC) and lowest-observable-effects concentration (LOEC) for the number of offspring per surviving female after exposure to R-11 were 0.5 and 0.75 mg/L, respectively. The NOEC and LOEC for population size after exposure to R-11 were (1.25 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Both of these values were lower than the EEC, indicating that R-11 does have the potential to cause damage to D. pulex populations after application at recommended field rates. The wide range of concentrations causing extinction makes it difficult to generalize about the potential impacts that agricultural adjuvants might have on aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, additional studies that examine effects on other nontarget organisms and determine residues in aquatic ecosystems may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14713050     DOI: 10.1897/02-504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Individual- and population-level toxicity of the insecticide, spirotetramat and the agricultural adjuvant, Destiny to the Cladoceran, Ceriodaphnia dubia.

Authors:  Xue Dong Chen; John D Stark
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Inhibition of cellular efflux pumps involved in multi xenobiotic resistance (MXR) in echinoid larvae as a possible mode of action for increased ecotoxicological risk of mixtures.

Authors:  Henrique M R Anselmo; Johannes H J van den Berg; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Albertinka J Murk
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Learning impairment in honey bees caused by agricultural spray adjuvants.

Authors:  Timothy J Ciarlo; Christopher A Mullin; James L Frazier; Daniel R Schmehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Toxicological Risks of Agrochemical Spray Adjuvants: Organosilicone Surfactants May Not Be Safe.

Authors:  Christopher A Mullin; Julia D Fine; Ryan D Reynolds; Maryann T Frazier
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-05-11

5.  Health, Pesticide Adjuvants, and Inert Ingredients: California Case Study Illustrates Need for Data Access.

Authors:  Caroline Cox; Michael Zeiss
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 11.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.