Literature DB >> 14711839

Antimicrobial usage and resistance trend relationships from the MYSTIC Programme in North America (1999-2001).

Alan H Mutnick1, Paul R Rhomberg, Helio S Sader, Ronald N Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The MYSTIC Programme is a global, longitudinal antimicrobial surveillance network of hospitals that frequently utilize carbapenems. One aspect of the programme is the ability to capture antimicrobial consumption data from participating institutions. The current report evaluates these relationships for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa over the initial 3 year period of the programme in the USA.
METHODS: Between 10 and 15 medical centres participated during 1999-2001, each submitting up to 200 isolates/year (7003 strains overall). Evaluations of the relationship between drug usage and antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae for the carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and piperacillin-tazobactam were determined. Data were analysed based on: (1) aggregate usage results; (2) medical centre-specific usage compared with resistance rates; and (3) medical centre-specific usage results compared with yearly changes in resistance rates (DeltaR). The parameter of drug usage was the defined daily dose (DDD)/100 patient days calculated from total grams administered, using WHO definitions.
RESULTS: Resistance (1999-2001) among Enterobacteriaceae did not change significantly for beta-lactams, but tended to increase slightly for gentamicin (+1.1%) and ciprofloxacin (+3.1%). P. aeruginosa resistance rates (1999-2001) for gentamicin (+9.0%) and ciprofloxacin (+10.2%) increased, in contrast to a significantly decreased resistance rate for meropenem (-7.7%). Formulary-use changes were noted: increased meropenem and ciprofloxacin use and decreased consumption for imipenem, aminoglycosides, ceftazidime and cefepime. Aggregate ciprofloxacin DDD/100 days rates were directly related (+3.3 DDD) to Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa resistance changes, whereas among P. aeruginosa, usage and resistance were inversely correlated for gentamicin (-3.8 DDD; +9.0% resistant). Medical centre-specific antimicrobial usage calculations did not demonstrate a correlation to rates of resistance (r = -0.38 to 0.61) or yearly changes in resistance rates (r = -0.56 to 0.43).
CONCLUSIONS: The availability of aggregate USA medical centre antimicrobial usage data enabled us to identify several important trends in the incidence of resistance among P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae: (1) increased use of ciprofloxacin associated with a higher resistance among Enterobacteriaceae; and (2) a correlation between ciprofloxacin categories of resistance and levels of resistance to other antimicrobial classes in P. aeruginosa. Medical centre-specific antimicrobial usage and resistance did not demonstrate direct statistical relationships, and require a continued search for other monitoring methods that can better identify antimicrobial/environmental factors that lead to resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14711839     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  25 in total

1.  The association between antibiotic use and resistance: the role of secondary antibiotics.

Authors:  J A Bosso; P D Mauldin; C D Salgado
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Keith Poole
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The in vitro activity of selected defensins against an isolate of Pseudomonas in the presence of human tears.

Authors:  A M McDermott; D Rich; J Cullor; M J Mannis; W Smith; T Reid; C J Murphy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Changes in antibiotic resistance of respiratory pathogens in the Slovak Republic.

Authors:  Jaroslav Timko
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Mathematical model to quantify the effects of risk factors on carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Michelle W Tan; David C Lye; Tat-Ming Ng; Michael Nikolaou; Vincent H Tam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cefixime-induced nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

Authors:  F Anzellotti; L Ricciardi; D Monaco; F Ciccocioppo; I Borrelli; H Zhuzhuni; M Onofrj
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Red man syndrome adverse reaction following intravenous infusion of cefepime.

Authors:  George Panos; Dionysios C Watson; Maria Sargianou; Dionysios Kampiotis; Paraskevi Chra
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Cefepime dosing in the morbidly obese patient population.

Authors:  Barrie S Rich; Rebecca Keel; Vanessa P Ho; Harma Turbendian; Cheguevara I Afaneh; Gregory F Dakin; Alfons Pomp; David P Nicolau; Philip S Barie
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Trends and correlation of antibacterial usage and bacterial resistance: time series analysis for antibacterial stewardship in a Chinese teaching hospital (2009-2013).

Authors:  Y M Zou; Y Ma; J H Liu; J Shi; T Fan; Y Y Shan; H P Yao; Y L Dong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Correlation between antibiotic use and changes in susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a medical-surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hatem Kallel; Fouzia Mahjoubi; Hassen Dammak; Mabrouk Bahloul; Chokri Ben Hamida; Hedi Chelly; Noureddine Rekik; Adnéne Hammami; Mounir Bouaziz
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.