Literature DB >> 14711470

Effects of a continuing education program on nurses' practices of cancer pain assessment and their acceptance of patients' pain reports.

Luo-Ping Ger1, Ching-Ying Chang, Shung-Tai Ho, Ming-Chien Lee, Hsien-Hsien Chiang, Co-Shi Chao, Kwok-Hung Lai, Jui-Mei Huang, Shih-Chun Wang.   

Abstract

A hospital-based quasi-experimental (pretest and post-test) study was conducted in Kaohsiung Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan. This study was to evaluate a continuing education program (CEP) on nurses' practices of cancer pain assessment and their acceptance of patients' pain reports with respect to four types of misconceptions. A questionnaire was sent to on-duty nurses or head nurses with patient care responsibilities before the implementation of CEP (n=645) and six months after the program (n=630). The response rates were 92.6% and 91.3% for pretest and post-test surveys, respectively. The CEP was implemented in 8 weeks with four-repeated sessions of 4-hour lectures. A one-day workshop focused on cancer pain assessment and treatment was held 3 months after the four-repeated sessions. Several educational strategies and teaching materials were used in the CEP. The results showed that CEP made statistically significant yet moderate improvement in nurses' practices of pain assessment using pain rating scales (pretest 3.29+/-0.76 vs. post-test 3.48+/-0.75, P<0.001) and acceptance of patient's pain reports without misconceptions on addiction (3.12+/-0.80 vs. 3.39+/-0.90, P<0.001), phantom pain (3.91+/-0.96 vs. 4.07+/-0.92, P=0.005), and placebo testing (3.63+/-0.72 vs. 3.81+/-0.73, P<0.001), except on patient gender-age-related doubts (3.60+/-0.72 vs. 3.67+/-0.77, P=0.109). In order to achieve further improvement, additional follow-up CEP combined with a hospital-wide institutionalization of pain assessment should be promoted and implemented in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14711470     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  5 in total

1.  A nationwide survey of knowledge of and compliance with cancer pain management guidelines by korean physicians.

Authors:  Do Yeun Kim; Jin Seok Ahn; Kyung Hee Lee; Young Chul Kim; Juneyoung Lee; Si-Young Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.679

2.  Improving communication in cancer pain management nursing: a randomized controlled study assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program.

Authors:  Delphine Canivet; Nicole Delvaux; Anne-Sophie Gibon; Cyrielle Brancart; Jean-Louis Slachmuylder; Darius Razavi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Patient's Perception of Stressors Associated with Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Kobra Parvan; Vahid Zamanzadeh; Sima Lak Dizaji; Mitra Mousavi Shabestari; Nasser Safaie
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2013-10-05

4.  Opioid-taking self-efficacy amongst Taiwanese outpatients with cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Yuan Liang; Patsy Yates; Helen Edwards; Shiow-Luan Tsay
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The influence of addiction risk on nursing students' expectations of patients' pain reports: a clinical vignette approach.

Authors:  Paula C Miceli; Joel Katz
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.