Literature DB >> 14710783

Current status of liver transplantation in children.

S V McDiarmid1.   

Abstract

There are two critical issues on opposite ends of the timeline for patients who are eligible for liver transplantation. On the one hand, the crisis in the cadaveric organ supply makes surviving to transplant ever more risky. On the other hand, patients who receive successful transplants face the consequences of long-term immunosuppression and its potentially life-threatening complications. The donor shortage is forcing difficult decisions that affect all patients who await liver transplantation. It is important to scrutinize carefully the results of all policies that govern allocation and the ethics of the solutions we advocate to ensure that no patient subgroup is being at a disadvantage. Current immunosuppression practices are being challenged by an increasing understanding of the immunologic events triggered by the allograft and the goal to free patients from consequences of a lifetime of immunosuppression. Clinicians can expect, and perhaps require, that new immunosuppressive protocols will address how the planned intervention might be expected to advance the understanding of tolerance mechanisms. As knowledge increases, clinicians can anticipate innovative new immunosuppressive proposals. Calcineurin and steroid-free induction, the use of donor-derived bone marrow infusion, recipient pretreatment, costimulatory blockade, and new antibody induction approaches are all being proposed--often in combination--for clinical trials. Researchers face additional challenges in defining endpoints if the goal is not just the short-term reduction in rejection but the minimization, and eventual discontinuation, of immunosuppressive drugs while maintaining excellent long-term graft function. How much "failure" will be accepted and how will it be defined? How will clinicians interpret liver biopsies if they begin to accept that some lymphocytic infiltrates may be beneficial mediators of the ongoing immune activation necessary for the maintenance of tolerance? How will they adjust immunosuppression practices to the dynamic processes in the immune response that maintain tolerance? Remarkable short-term successes in providing transplants for thousands of children with liver failure have brought these challenges into sharp focus. Clinicians must seek to move the life-giving science of transplantation toward a new goal: providing long lifetimes of excellent graft function with minimal toxicity from immunosuppressive drugs and the hope of freedom from immunosuppression altogether. Pediatric liver recipients, whose grafts have inherent tolerogenic potential and for whom we can anticipate decades of life after transplant, may prove to be an ideal study population to further these goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14710783     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(03)00150-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am        ISSN: 0031-3955            Impact factor:   3.278


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ethical tensions in solid organ transplantation: the price of success.

Authors:  Sanjay Kulkarni; David-C Cronin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Access to pediatric liver transplantation: does regional variation play a role?

Authors:  Mary T Austin; Irene D Feurer; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Predictors of survival following liver transplantation in infants: a single-center analysis of more than 200 cases.

Authors:  Robert S Venick; Douglas G Farmer; Sue V McDiarmid; John P Duffy; Sherilyn A Gordon; Hasan Yersiz; Johnny C Hong; Jorge H Vargas; Marvin E Ament; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Long-term management of immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation: is minimization or withdrawal desirable or possible or both?

Authors:  Sandy Feng
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Pediatric liver transplantation: predictors of survival and resource utilization.

Authors:  Amy E Wagenaar; Jun Tashiro; Juan E Sola; Obi Ekwenna; Akin Tekin; Eduardo A Perez
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Treatment options for chronic cholestasis in infancy and childhood.

Authors:  Vicky Lee Ng; William F Balistreri
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10

7.  Outcomes following liver transplantation in young infants: Data from the SPLIT registry.

Authors:  Ajay K Jain; Ravinder Anand; Stacee Lerret; George Yanni; Jia-Yuh Chen; Saeed Mohammad; Majella Doyle; Greg Telega; Simon Horslen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Pediatric liver transplantation outcomes in Korea.

Authors:  Jong Man Kim; Kyung Mo Kim; Nam-Joon Yi; Yon Ho Choe; Myung Soo Kim; Kyung Suk Suh; Soon I I Kim; Suk-Koo Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Long-term survival and its related factors in pediatric liver transplant recipients of shiraz transplant center, shiraz, iran in 2012.

Authors:  Najmeh Haseli; Jafar Hassanzadeh; Seyed Mohsen Dehghani; Ali Bahador; Seyed Ali Malek Hosseini
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 0.660

10.  Living related donor liver transplantation in Iranian children: a 12- year experience.

Authors:  Najmeh Haseli; Jafar Hassanzade; Seyed Mohsen Dehghani; Ali Bahador; Seyed Ali Malek-Hosseini
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2013
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.