OBJECTIVE: To monitor the effectiveness of deep community wells in reducing exposure to elevated levels of arsenic in groundwater pumped from shallower aquifers. METHODS: Six community wells ranging in depth from 60 m to 140 m were installed in villages where very few of the wells already present produced safe water. By means of flow meters and interviews with villagers carrying water from the community wells, a study was made of the extent to which these were used during one year. The results were compared with household and well data obtained during a previous survey in the same area. FINDINGS: The mean arsenic concentration in water pumped from wells already in use in the villages where the community wells, were installed was 180 +/- 140 micrograms/l (n = 956). Monthly sampling for 4-11 months showed that arsenic levels in groundwater from five of the six newly installed wells were consistently within the WHO guideline value of 10 micrograms/l for drinking-water. One of these wells met the Bangladesh standard of 50 micrograms/l arsenic but failed to meet the WHO guideline values for manganese and uranium in drinking-water. The community wells were very popular. Many women walked hundreds of metres each day to fetch water from them. On average, 2200 litres were hand-pumped daily from each community well, regardless of the season. CONCLUSION: A single community well can meet the needs of some 500 people residing within a radius of 150 m of it in a densely populated village. Properly monitored community wells should become more prominent in campaigns to reduce arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Between 8000 and 10,000 deep community wells are needed to provide safe water for the four to five million people living in the most severely affected parts of the country.
OBJECTIVE: To monitor the effectiveness of deep community wells in reducing exposure to elevated levels of arsenic in groundwater pumped from shallower aquifers. METHODS: Six community wells ranging in depth from 60 m to 140 m were installed in villages where very few of the wells already present produced safe water. By means of flow meters and interviews with villagers carrying water from the community wells, a study was made of the extent to which these were used during one year. The results were compared with household and well data obtained during a previous survey in the same area. FINDINGS: The mean arsenic concentration in water pumped from wells already in use in the villages where the community wells, were installed was 180 +/- 140 micrograms/l (n = 956). Monthly sampling for 4-11 months showed that arsenic levels in groundwater from five of the six newly installed wells were consistently within the WHO guideline value of 10 micrograms/l for drinking-water. One of these wells met the Bangladesh standard of 50 micrograms/l arsenic but failed to meet the WHO guideline values for manganese and uranium in drinking-water. The community wells were very popular. Many women walked hundreds of metres each day to fetch water from them. On average, 2200 litres were hand-pumped daily from each community well, regardless of the season. CONCLUSION: A single community well can meet the needs of some 500 people residing within a radius of 150 m of it in a densely populated village. Properly monitored community wells should become more prominent in campaigns to reduce arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Between 8000 and 10,000 deep community wells are needed to provide safe water for the four to five million people living in the most severely affected parts of the country.
Authors: I Choudhury; K M Ahmed; M Hasan; M R H Mozumder; P S K Knappett; T Ellis; A van Geen Journal: Ground Water Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: A van Geen; K M Ahmed; E B Ahmed; I Choudhury; M R Mozumder; B C Bostick; B J Mailloux Journal: J Water Sanit Hyg Dev Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.250
Authors: Alexander van Geen; Ershad B Ahmed; Lynnette Pitcher; Jacob L Mey; Habibul Ahsan; Joseph H Graziano; Kazi Matin Ahmed Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Jennifer Jane Winston; Veronica Escamilla; Carolina Perez-Heydrich; Margaret Carrel; Mohammad Yunus; Peter Kim Streatfield; Michael Emch Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine Marie George; Yan Zheng; Joseph H Graziano; Shahriar Bin Rasul; Zakir Hossain; Jacob L Mey; Alexander van Geen Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Gail A Wasserman; Xinhua Liu; Faruque Parvez; Yu Chen; Pam Factor-Litvak; Nancy J LoIacono; Diane Levy; Hasan Shahriar; Mohammed Nasir Uddin; Tariqul Islam; Angela Lomax; Roheeni Saxena; Elizabeth A Gibson; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Olgica Balac; Tiffany Sanchez; Jennie K Kline; David Santiago; Tyler Ellis; Alexander van Geen; Joseph H Graziano Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 9.621