Literature DB >> 14710071

Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation.

Susan M Taylor1, Audrey A Romero, Dorothy N Kammerer-Doak, Clifford Qualls, Rebecca G Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications of abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged, myomatous uterus with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical records of 139 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation and 244 patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy for an enlarged, myomatous uterus between August 1990 and July 2001 were reviewed. Uterine weights of >982 g were excluded because this was the largest uterus removed vaginally, which left 208 evaluable cases of total abdominal hysterectomy. The perioperative and postoperative course of the two groups was compared. The Student t test was used for continuous variables, and the Fisher exact test was used for binary or categoric data.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in surgical or anesthetic risk factors (P>.05). Operative time was similar between the groups (P>.05). Length of hospital stay was increased significantly with total abdominal hysterectomy (mean, 3.9 days vs 2.6 days; P<.001). Perioperative complications were increased with the abdominal route (10% vs 25%, P<.001).
CONCLUSION: In this large series, uterine morcellation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy is safe and facilitates the removal of moderately enlarged and well-supported uteri and is associated with decreased hospital stay and perioperative morbidity rate compared with the abdominal route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14710071     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00942-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Abdominal hysterectomy: a new approach for conventional procedure.

Authors:  Dilip Kumar Dutta; Indranil Dutta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  Vaginal morcellation through the posterior cul-de-sac using an electromechanical morcellator after laparoscopic myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy: a retrospective, case-control study.

Authors:  Eun-Ju Lee; Dong-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Twenty-first century laparoscopic hysterectomy: should we not leave the vaginal step out?

Authors:  A R H Twijnstra; N A Kianmanesh Rad; M J G H Smeets; J F Admiraal; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-03-21

4.  Transvaginal morcellation.

Authors:  Lindsay Clark Donat; Mitchell Clark; Amanda M Tower; Gulden Menderes; Vinita Parkash; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus.

Authors:  Francesco Sesti; Velia Ruggeri; Adalgisa Pietropolli; Emilio Piccione
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ewelina Litwińska; Marek Nowak; Dorota Kolasa-Zwierzchowska; Anna Nowińska-Serwach; Jacek Władziński; Artur Szpakowski; Marian Szpakowski; Jacek R Wilczyński
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2014-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.