Literature DB >> 14709182

Report from the CDC. Telephone focus groups: an emerging method in public health research.

Crystale Purvis Cooper1, Cynthia M Jorgensen, Tracie L Merritt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The focus group is a widely used qualitative method in public health research. Typically, focus groups involve face-to-face interaction, although focus groups have also been conducted via telephone conference calls.
METHODS: The indexed medical and social sciences literature was reviewed to assess what is empirically known about the telephone focus group method and how this method has been used to explore health topics.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies reported in 16 publications were found that used telephone focus groups. Of the 13 studies, 12 investigated health topics, and none explored any methodological issues. Some health studies used the telephone focus group method exclusively, whereas others used it in conjunction with additional methods. The studies involved a variety of lay and professional populations in six countries and explored a range of topics. Several of the studies included participants from a wide geographic area, such as across the entire United States. Two rationales for using the telephone focus group method were reported: assembling geographically disparate participants and increasing participant anonymity by eliminating visual contact.
CONCLUSIONS: Health researchers appear to be the primary users of the telephone focus group method for academic research. The telephone focus group method may be especially useful in health studies involving populations that do not have adequate representation in any single region and studies investigating sensitive topics. Methods studies are needed to compare the group dynamics of telephone and in-person focus groups and determine the most appropriate size and duration for telephone focus groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14709182     DOI: 10.1089/154099903322643866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  12 in total

1.  Using telephone focus groups methodology to examine the prostate cancer screening practices of African-American primary care physicians.

Authors:  Louie E Ross; Leonardo A Stroud; Shyanika W Rose; Cynthia M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Stakeholder perceptions of thoracic rapid tissue donation: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Jessica McIntyre; Christie Pratt; Rebecca D Pentz; Eric B Haura; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Comparison of focus groups on cancer and employment conducted face to face or by telephone.

Authors:  Linda M Frazier; Virginia A Miller; Douglas V Horbelt; James E Delmore; Brigitte E Miller; Angelia M Paschal
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-02-08

4.  Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Susan V Eisen; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  The management of chronic diseases in rural Missouri practices.

Authors:  Maithe Enriquez; Jill Moormeier; William Lafferty
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun

6.  Risk of future cardiovascular disease in women with prior preeclampsia: a focus group study.

Authors:  Ellen W Seely; Janet Rich-Edwards; Janet Lui; Jacinda M Nicklas; Aditi Saxena; Eleni Tsigas; Sue E Levkoff
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  "Their Packaging Has Always Been Like a Power": A Qualitative Study of U.S. Smokers' Perceptions of Cigarette Pack Visual Design Features to Inform Product Regulation.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Paige E Averett; Tiffany Blanchflower; Nunzio Landi; Kyle R Gregory
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Advancing Telephone Focus Groups Method Through the Use of Webinar: Methodological Reflections on Evaluating Ontario, Canada's Healthy Babies Healthy Children Program.

Authors:  Eunice Chong; Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels; Lori Webel-Edgar; Sarah Muir; Heather Manson
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2015-10-05

9.  Understanding the information needs of women with rheumatoid arthritis concerning pregnancy, post-natal care and early parenting: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Ilana N Ackerman; Joanne E Jordan; Sharon Van Doornum; Margaret Ricardo; Andrew M Briggs
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Is the cigarette pack just a wrapper or a characteristic of the product itself? A qualitative study of adult smokers to inform U.S. regulations.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Paige E Averett; Tiffany Blanchflower; Kyle R Gregory
Journal:  J Cancer Policy       Date:  2017-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.