Literature DB >> 14707944

Lack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest pain.

Judd E Hollander1, Frank D Sites, Charles V Pollack, Frances S Shofer.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Low-risk patients with chest pain are often admitted to monitored beds; however, the use of telemetry beds in this cohort is not evidence based. We tested the hypothesis that monitoring admitted low-risk patients with chest pain for dysrhythmia is low yield (<1% detection of life-threatening dysrhythmias requiring treatment).
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain with a Goldman risk score of less than 8%, a normal initial creatine kinase-MB level, and a negative initial troponin I level admitted to non-ICU monitored beds. Investigators followed the hospital course daily. The main outcome was cardiovascular death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmia during telemetry.
RESULTS: Of 3,681 patients with chest pain who presented to the ED, 1,750 patients were admitted to non-ICU monitored beds. Of these, 1,029 patients had a Goldman risk score of less than 8%, a troponin I level of less than 0.3 ng/mL, and a creatine kinase-MB level of less than 5 ng/mL (accounting for 59% of all chest pain telemetry admissions). During hospitalization, there were no patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation requiring treatment on the telemetry service (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0% to 0.3%). There were 2 deaths: neither was cardiovascular in nature or preventable by monitoring (cardiovascular preventable death rate=0%; 95% CI 0.0% to 0.3%).
CONCLUSION: The routine use of telemetry monitoring for low-risk patients with chest pain is of limited utility. Admission to nonmonitored beds might help alleviate ED crowding without increasing risk of adverse events caused by dysrhythmia in patients with a Goldman risk of less than 8%, an initial troponin I level of less than 0.3 ng/mL, and a creatine kinase-MB level of less than 5 ng/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14707944     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00719-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Is telemetry useful in evaluating chest pain patients in an observation unit?

Authors:  Shamai A Grossman; Nathan I Shapiro; J Lawrence Mottley; Leon Sanchez; Edward Ullman; Richard E Wolfe
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Prospective validation of a clinical decision rule to identify patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who can safely be removed from cardiac monitoring.

Authors:  Shahbaz Syed; Mathieu Gatien; Jeffrey J Perry; Hina Chaudry; Soo-Min Kim; Kenneth Kwong; Muhammad Mukarram; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Michael J Ward; Mark H Eckman; Daniel P Schauer; Ali S Raja; Sean Collins
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Direct hospital costs of chest pain patients attending the emergency department: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jakob L Forberg; Louise S Henriksen; Lars Edenbrandt; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2006-05-04

5.  A comparative analysis of risk stratification tools for emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Ellen Burkett; Thomas Marwick; Ogilvie Thom; Anne-Maree Kelly
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02-07

6.  Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin.

Authors:  Michael Perera; Leena Aggarwal; Ian A Scott; Bentley Logan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-09-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.