BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed HIV infection is prevalent among patients who present to urban emergency departments (EDs). Providing appropriate counseling, testing, and follow-up in the ED is difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a referral-based outpatient HIV testing system for patients referred from the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study performed at an urban teaching hospital. Consecutive patients referred from the emergency department (ED) for outpatient HIV testing were enrolled. Data were collected from each patient's ED record and HIV clinic record, if applicable. RESULTS: Of the 586 referrals made from our ED, 494 (84%) met inclusion criteria. Only 56 patients (11%, 95% CI: 9-15%) arrived at the HIV clinic and completed pretest counseling. Of these, 51 (91%, 95% CI: 80-97%) tested negative for HIV, 4 (7%, 95% CI: 2-17%) tested positive for HIV, and 1 (2%, 95% CI: 0-10%) refused the test. CONCLUSIONS: This referral system was ineffective at identifying unrecognized HIV infection due to poor adherence. Changes in the structure of the referral system or the use of point-of-care testing in the ED may improve the ability to detect HIV infection in this setting.
BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed HIV infection is prevalent among patients who present to urban emergency departments (EDs). Providing appropriate counseling, testing, and follow-up in the ED is difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a referral-based outpatient HIV testing system for patients referred from the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study performed at an urban teaching hospital. Consecutive patients referred from the emergency department (ED) for outpatient HIV testing were enrolled. Data were collected from each patient's ED record and HIV clinic record, if applicable. RESULTS: Of the 586 referrals made from our ED, 494 (84%) met inclusion criteria. Only 56 patients (11%, 95% CI: 9-15%) arrived at the HIV clinic and completed pretest counseling. Of these, 51 (91%, 95% CI: 80-97%) tested negative for HIV, 4 (7%, 95% CI: 2-17%) tested positive for HIV, and 1 (2%, 95% CI: 0-10%) refused the test. CONCLUSIONS: This referral system was ineffective at identifying unrecognized HIV infection due to poor adherence. Changes in the structure of the referral system or the use of point-of-care testing in the ED may improve the ability to detect HIV infection in this setting.
Authors: Danielle Signer; Stephen Peterson; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Somiya Haider; Mustapha Saheed; Paula Neira; Cassie Wicken; Richard E Rothman Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Michael S Lyons; Christopher J Lindsell; Holly K Ledyard; Peter T Frame; Alexander T Trott Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Jason S Haukoos; Douglas A E White; Michael S Lyons; Emily Hopkins; Yvette Calderon; Brian Kalish; Richard E Rothman Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Roland C Merchant; George R Seage; Kenneth H Mayer; Melissa A Clark; Victor G DeGruttola; Bruce M Becker Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Michael S Lyons; Christopher J Lindsell; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Gretchen Williams Torres; Juliet Yonek; Jeremy Pickreign; Heidi Whitmore; Romana Hasnain-Wynia Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Michael S Lyons; Dana L Raab; Christopher J Lindsell; Alexander T Trott; Carl J Fichtenbaum Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-10-15 Impact factor: 2.655