Literature DB >> 14707395

Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones leaving the gallbladder in situ. A cohort study with long-term follow-up.

W H Schreurs1, W J Vles, W H N M Stuifbergen, H J M Oostvogel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstructive jaundice caused by stones is a common disorder, mostly managed by endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not clearance of the common bile duct alone is sufficient as treatment for patients with choledocholithiasis.
METHODS: A cohort with 447 patients with symptomatic cholecystocholedocholithiasis, undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and if necessary sphincterotomy (ES). In 164 patients common bile duct stones were proven and treated endoscopically, without performing a subsequent cholecystectomy. All 164 patients were free of symptoms after the endoscopic intervention. This group of patients was compared with 78 patients who underwent cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Patients were followed for 1-13 years after ERC and sphincterotomy results and complications were registered.
RESULTS: The ages of the 164 patients in the in situ group were significantly higher than in the cholecystectomy group and the ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists) was significantly higher in the in situ patients. Mean follow-up was 70.9 months. Of the in situ patients 27 (16%) returned with biliary symptoms; 12 with common bile duct stones, three with cholangitis, and one with stenosis of Vater's papilla. Eight patients returned with cholecystitis and 3 with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Thirteen patients underwent cholecystectomy and 11 were managed (also) endoscopically. Minor complications were 2 wound infections and 1 bleeding after cholecystectomy. Two patients (1%) died of abdominal sepsis due to cholecystitis. Of the patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 6 (7.6%) returned during follow-up. Three patients had common bile duct stones, 2 had cholangitis and 1 patient presented with papillostenosis. Three patients needed surgical common bile duct exploration and the other 3 were treated endoscopically. After reintervention, cardiopulmonary complications were observed in 1 patient. There was no related death.
CONCLUSION: When common bile duct stones are treated successfully by endoscopic sphincterotomy and patients are free of symptoms, there is no need for routine prophylactic cholecystectomy. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14707395     DOI: 10.1159/000075944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  13 in total

1.  Is cholecystectomy necessary after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in patients older than 80 years of age?

Authors:  Takaharu Yasui; Shunichi Takahata; Hiroshi Kono; Yosuke Nagayoshi; Yasuhisa Mori; Kosuke Tsutsumi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Mortality associated with the treatment of gallstone disease: a 10-year contemporary national experience.

Authors:  John M Scollay; Russell Mullen; Gillian McPhillips; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Expectant treatment of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years of age.

Authors:  R Costi; L Sarli; V Violi; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms.

Authors:  Stefan Heinrich; Markus Schäfer; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors of acute cholecystitis after endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Jun Kyu Lee; Ji Kon Ryu; Joo Kyung Park; Won Jae Yoon; Sang Hyub Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nechol L Allen; Ruth R Leeth; Kelly R Finan; Darren S Tishler; Selwyn M Vickers; C Mel Wilcox; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy versus deferral in the care of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Jason D Archibald; Jonathan R Love; Vivian C McAlister
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Selective MRCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Stuart Mercer; Sukhpal Singh; Iain Paterson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.