Literature DB >> 14706581

Optimal closure method of five-millimeter trocar sites.

Kristi L Harold1, Sharon L Goldstein, Cynthia D Nelms, Brent D Matthews, Ronald F Sing, Kent W Kercher, Amy Lincourt, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many surgeons use absorbable sutures for skin closure of 5-mm trocar sites, effective alternative materials exist. We compared 5-mm trocar site closures using a vicryl suture (VS), cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (CTA), or skin tape (ST).
METHODS: Patients rated wound pain and appearance at 1 and 6 weeks after surgery. Seven surgeons masked to the closure method rated wound photographs at these time points using the Hollander wound evaluation scale. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the ratings of each closure group.
RESULTS: The 137 wounds of 48 patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures were randomized among three closure method groups. Patient demographics and procedure type were similar for all groups. Long closure times (>30 seconds) was significantly higher for VS compared with CTA and ST. Patients favored VS over ST and CTA at 1 week with respect to pain and wound appearance (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). They rated CTA closures more likely to have pain and poor wound appearance at 6 weeks (P = 0.05 and P = 0.03, respectively). Surgeons rated VS less likely (P = 0.02) and CTA more likely (P = 0.003) to show moderate to severe scar formation. Vicryl suture was less likely to have wound separation and edge inversion (P = 0.017 and P = 0.006, respectively). Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive was more likely to yield step-off (P = 0.03), contour irregularities (P = 0.005), separation (P = 0.004), excessive distortion (P = 0.001), and edge inversion (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Although VS closure time of 5-mm trocar sites takes longer than CTA and ST, VS scar formation and comfort is superior to CTA and ST. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive yields poor results with respect to both wound healing and pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706581     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Adhesive Strips and Dermal Sutures vs Dermal Sutures Only on Wound Closure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Trenton Custis; April W Armstrong; Thomas H King; Victoria R Sharon; Daniel B Eisen
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 2.  Use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in general surgery.

Authors:  David García Cerdá; Antonio Martín Ballester; Alicia Aliena-Valero; Anna Carabén-Redaño; José M Lloris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of skin adhesives versus sutures in closure of laparoscopic port-site wounds.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Mohammed R Siddiqui; Munir A Khan; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  To stitch or not to stitch: the skin closure of laparoscopic port sites, a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucy P Aitchison; Andy Z L Chen; Clare Toms; Charbel Sandroussi; David A Yeo; Daniel Steffens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  A bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue.

Authors:  Seung Yun Yang; Eoin D O'Cearbhaill; Geoffroy C Sisk; Kyeng Min Park; Woo Kyung Cho; Martin Villiger; Brett E Bouma; Bohdan Pomahac; Jeffrey M Karp
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.