Literature DB >> 14706518

Evaluation of the genotoxicity of four herbicides in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster using two different strains.

Bülent Kaya1, Ricardo Marcos, Atila Yanikoğlu, Amadeu Creus.   

Abstract

In the present study, the herbicides bentazone, molinate, thiobencarb and trifluralin were evaluated for mutagenic and recombinagenic effects using the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster (somatic mutation and recombination test, SMART). Both standard (ST) and high-bioactivation (HB) fly crosses were used, the latter cross is characterised by a high sensitivity to promutagens and procarcinogens. Three-day-old larvae, transheterozygous for the multiple wing hairs (mwh, 3-0.3) and flare-3 (flr(3), 3-38.8) genes, were chronically fed with six different concentrations of each herbicide. Feeding ended with pupation of the surviving larvae and the genetic changes induced in somatic cells of the wing's imaginal discs lead to the formation of mutant clones on the wing blade. Point mutation, chromosome breakage and mitotic recombination produce single spots; while twin spots are produced only by mitotic recombination. Bentazone, usually considered as a non-mutagen, gave positive results in the wing spot test with the high-bioactivation cross. Molinate, about which information on mutagenic effects is inconclusive, gave positive responses in both the standard and the high-bioactivation crosses, while the other thiocarbamate, thiobencarb, gave positive results only in the standard cross and at the highest concentration tested (10 mM). Finally, trifluralin, one of the most widely studied herbicides for genotoxic effects, gave positive results in the wing spot test with both crosses. Apart from the interest of the results found in the genotoxic evaluation of the four selected herbicides, our results also contribute to extend the existing database on the Drosophila wing spot test, and corroborate the utility of the use of high-bioactivation strains for the genotoxic evaluation of xenobiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706518     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  A model system for analyzing somatic mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia; Anastasia Derventzi; Rita Busuttil; R Brent Calder; Ernesto Perez; Linda Chadwell; Martijn E T Dollé; Martha Lundell; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Genotoxic evaluation of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in the Drosophila wing spot test.

Authors:  Mehmet Gürbüzel; Ugur Karaca; Nermin Karayilan
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 3.  Dinitroaniline herbicides: a comprehensive review of toxicity and side effects on animal non-target organisms.

Authors:  Anita Giglio; Maria Luigia Vommaro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to trifluralin in the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Daehee Kang; Sue Kyung Park; Laura Beane-Freeman; Charles F Lynch; Charles E Knott; Dale P Sandler; Jane A Hoppin; Mustafa Dosemeci; Joseph Coble; Jay Lubin; Aaron Blair; Michael Alavanja
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Age- and temperature-dependent somatic mutation accumulation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia; R Brent Calder; Martijn E T Dollé; Martha Lundell; Pankaj Kapahi; Jan Vijg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Genome instability, cancer and aging.

Authors:  Alexander Y Maslov; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-03-31

7.  Publication trends of somatic mutation and recombination tests research: a bibliometric analysis (1984‒2020).

Authors:  Ghada Tagorti; Bülent Kaya
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2022-03-31

8.  Evaluation of the biological activity of naturally occurring 5,8-dihydroxycoumarin.

Authors:  Gražina Slapšytė; Veronika Dedonytė; Juozas R Lazutka; Jūratė Mierauskienė; Vaidotas Morkūnas; Rita Kazernavičiūtė; Audrius Pukalskas; Petras Rimantas Venskutonis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.