Literature DB >> 14706459

Two new mouse chromosome 11 balancers.

Jan Klysik1, Chris Dinh, Allan Bradley.   

Abstract

Segmental inversions causing recombination suppression are an essential feature of balancer chromosomes. Meiotic crossing over between homologous chromosomes within an inversion interval will lead to nonviable gametes, while gametes generated from recombination events elsewhere on the chromosome will be unaffected. This apparent recombination suppression has been widely exploited in genetic studies in Drosophila to maintain and analyze stocks carrying recessive lethal mutations. Balancers are particularly useful in mutagenesis screens since they help to establish the approximate genomic location of alleles of genes causing phenotypes. Using the Cre-loxP recombination system, we have constructed two mouse balancer chromosomes carrying 8- and 30-cM inversions between Wnt3 and D11Mit69 and between Trp53 and EgfR loci, respectively. The Wnt3-D11Mit69 inversion mutates the Wnt3 locus and is therefore homozygous lethal. The Trp53-EgfR inversion is homozygous viable, since the EgfR locus is intact and mutations in p53 are homozygous viable. A dominantly acting K14-agouti minigene tags both rearrangements, which enables these balancer chromosomes to be visibly tracked in mouse stocks. With the addition of these balancers to the previously reported Trp53-Wnt3 balancer, most of mouse chromosome 11 is now available in balancer stocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706459     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mouse chromosome engineering for modeling human disease.

Authors:  Louise van der Weyden; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.929

2.  Creating a "hopeful monster": mouse forward genetic screens.

Authors:  Vanessa L Horner; Tamara Caspary
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

3.  Generation and maintenance of Dmbx1 gene-targeted mutant alleles.

Authors:  Akihira Ohtoshi; Allan Bradley; Richard R Behringer; Ichiko Nishijima
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Genetic control of X chromosome inactivation in mice: definition of the Xce candidate interval.

Authors:  Lisa Helbling Chadwick; Lisa M Pertz; Karl W Broman; Marisa S Bartolomei; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond.

Authors:  Koen J T Venken; Alejandro Sarrion-Perdigones; Paul J Vandeventer; Nicholas S Abel; Audrey E Christiansen; Kristi L Hoffman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 5.814

Review 6.  Modeling chromosomes in mouse to explore the function of genes, genomic disorders, and chromosomal organization.

Authors:  Véronique Brault; Patricia Pereira; Arnaud Duchon; Yann Hérault
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Modeling of the human alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma Pax3-Foxo1 chromosome translocation in mouse myoblasts using CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease.

Authors:  Irina V Lagutina; Virginia Valentine; Fabrizio Picchione; Frank Harwood; Marcus B Valentine; Barbara Villarejo-Balcells; Jaime J Carvajal; Gerard C Grosveld
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Generation of a Mouse Full-length Balancer with Versatile Cassette-shuttling Selection Strategy.

Authors:  Zhisheng Ye; Lei Sun; Rongbo Li; Min Han; Yuan Zhuang; Xiaohui Wu; Tian Xu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 6.580

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.