AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate an innovative approach to the provision of primary care-based diabetes services in Bradford, UK. The service model differs from others in comprising 19 clinics which offer a specialist service, intermediate between primary and secondary care, to all patients within the Bradford area. METHODS: The study included: analysis of referral, attendance and register data; questionnaires to general practitioners (GPs) and specialist clinic providers; qualitative interviews with clinic and other professional staff and patients; and an economic analysis. RESULTS: The 19 clinics adopt a range of organizational models. In the first 3 1/2 years, 2415 patients were referred. There was a significant reduction in out-patient attendances at hospital, but also a significant increase in overall patient attendances. Specialist clinic patients differed from hospital patients in being older and having had diabetes for longer since diagnosis. Ten of the 14 clinics run by practising GPs attracted more referrals from within their practices than from outside. GPs and patients across the city believed the clinics were valuable, the main benefits being geographical accessibility, availability of specialists in a community setting, short waiting times for first appointments at most clinics, and continuity of staff. Their reservations included a lack of strategic planning in the location of clinics, long waiting times at some clinics, and poor communication at some clinics with referring GPs. The cost of the primary care clinics is similar to hospital clinics. CONCLUSIONS: This model of specialist primary care services offers an opportunity to develop diabetes services that are convenient to patients, popular with practitioners, and increase capacity. However, the shortcomings as well as the advantages of the model need to be addressed if it is to be implemented elsewhere or for other patient groups.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate an innovative approach to the provision of primary care-based diabetes services in Bradford, UK. The service model differs from others in comprising 19 clinics which offer a specialist service, intermediate between primary and secondary care, to all patients within the Bradford area. METHODS: The study included: analysis of referral, attendance and register data; questionnaires to general practitioners (GPs) and specialist clinic providers; qualitative interviews with clinic and other professional staff and patients; and an economic analysis. RESULTS: The 19 clinics adopt a range of organizational models. In the first 3 1/2 years, 2415 patients were referred. There was a significant reduction in out-patient attendances at hospital, but also a significant increase in overall patient attendances. Specialist clinic patients differed from hospital patients in being older and having had diabetes for longer since diagnosis. Ten of the 14 clinics run by practising GPs attracted more referrals from within their practices than from outside. GPs and patients across the city believed the clinics were valuable, the main benefits being geographical accessibility, availability of specialists in a community setting, short waiting times for first appointments at most clinics, and continuity of staff. Their reservations included a lack of strategic planning in the location of clinics, long waiting times at some clinics, and poor communication at some clinics with referring GPs. The cost of the primary care clinics is similar to hospital clinics. CONCLUSIONS: This model of specialist primary care services offers an opportunity to develop diabetes services that are convenient to patients, popular with practitioners, and increase capacity. However, the shortcomings as well as the advantages of the model need to be addressed if it is to be implemented elsewhere or for other patient groups.
Authors: Anthony W Russell; Maria Donald; Samantha J Borg; Jianzhen Zhang; Letitia H Burridge; Robert S Ware; Nelufa Begum; H David McIntyre; Claire L Jackson Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Natalie Armstrong; Darrin Baines; Richard Baker; Richard Crossman; Melanie Davies; Ainsley Hardy; Kamlesh Khunti; Sudhesh Kumar; Joseph Paul O'Hare; Neil Raymond; Ponnusamy Saravanan; Nigel Stallard; Ala Szczepura; Andrew Wilson Journal: Trials Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Andrew Wilson; Joseph Paul O'Hare; Ainsley Hardy; Neil Raymond; Ala Szczepura; Ric Crossman; Darrin Baines; Kamlesh Khunti; Sudhesh Kumar; Ponnusamy Saravanan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 3.240