Literature DB >> 14706008

Characteristics of image-detected solid renal masses: implication for optimal treatment.

Guorong Li1, Muriel Cuilleron, Anne Gentil-Perret, Jacques Tostain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Solid renal masses are found increasingly. Further analysis of the characteristics of solid renal masses is useful for optimal treatment.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all solid renal masses was conducted from December 1998 to May 2003 at the Urology Department, Central University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France. A total of 162 solid renal masses were treated. The preoperative imaging diagnosis of ultrasound and computed tomography, and final pathological results were reviewed.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five tumors were pathologically confirmed to be renal cell carcinomas (RCC); 17 tumors (10.5%) were benign. There were eight renal oncocytomas, eight renal angiomyolipomas and one benign mixed epithelial/stroma tumor. Three oncocytomas and five angiomyolipomas were strongly suspected before surgery. The majority of the benign tumors were < or =4 cm. The percentage of small benign tumors (< or =4 cm) was significantly higher than large benign tumors (>4 cm). Although it is possible to use imaging to detect some benign tumors, the majority of benign tumors cannot be diagnosed definitively by imaging before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy in solid renal masses is tumor-size related. Benign solid renal tumors appear mainly as small-sized tumors. The preoperative differentiation between an RCC and a benign tumor can be difficult. Our data suggest that a biopsy is necessary in selected patients to achieve the maximum accuracy in order to provide optimal treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706008     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  7 in total

1.  Re: Pilot study of transcatheter arterial ethanol emolization under closed renal circuit for large renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  G McNeill; D Halpenny; A Snow; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography in characterization of solid renal masses.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Anil Chauhan; Paras Lakhani; Yan Xiu; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial experience.

Authors:  Scott Gerst; Lucy E Hann; Duan Li; Mithat Gonen; Satish Tickoo; Michael J Sohn; Paul Russo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Cryptococcus granuloma mimicking local progressed tumor after cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma: A case report.

Authors:  Hikari Fukui; Masashi Fujimori; Takashi Yamanaka; Naritaka Matsushita; Seiya Kishi; Chisami Nagata; Yuki Omori; Kouhei Nishikawa; Hiroto Yuasa; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 6.  Biopsy of renal masses: when and why.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Comparison of MDCT, MRI and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of focal renal lesions: The defender, challenger, and winner!

Authors:  Ankur Goyal; Raju Sharma; Ashu S Bhalla; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Amlesh Seth
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.