Literature DB >> 14705300

An economic evaluation of increased uptake in Q fever vaccination among meat and agricultural industry workers following implementation of the National Q Fever Management Program.

Michelle Kermode1, Karen Yong, Susan Hurley, Barrie Marmion.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Q fever is a serious but vaccine-preventable infectious disease that predominantly affects those working in the meat and agricultural industries. In October 2000, the Commonwealth Government introduced the National Q Fever Management Program. This economic evaluation assesses the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of improved vaccine uptake among meat and agricultural industry workers.
METHODS: Separate analyses were conducted for meat and agricultural industry workers. Clinical and epidemiological data used to create the models were obtained from published sources. Markov modelling was used to estimate the impact of Q fever vaccination uptake on the direct costs and outcomes of Q fever over a 20-year period.
RESULTS: Increasing vaccine uptake from 65% to 100% among meat industry workers results in an incremental cost per life year gained of $20,002, and a cost per QALY of $6,294. Increasing vaccine uptake from zero to 20% among agricultural industry workers results in an incremental cost per life year gained of $24,950, and a cost per QALY of $7,984. Including some indirect costs in the form of Workcover payments results in cost savings for both industry groups.
CONCLUSION: The results of this evaluation indicate that public health strategies to enhance the uptake of Q fever vaccine among high-risk workers potentially provides excellent value for the money invested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14705300     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2003.tb00415.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  8 in total

1.  Coxiella burnetii and milk pasteurization: an early application of the precautionary principle?

Authors:  O Cerf; R Condron
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 2.  Animal models of Q fever (Coxiella burnetii).

Authors:  Kevin R Bewley
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  The potential economic value of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine among hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Yeohan Song; Julie H Y Tai; Sarah M Bartsch; Richard K Zimmerman; Robert R Muder; Bruce Y Lee
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Seasonal density fluctuations of the exotic ornate kangaroo tick, Amblyomma triguttatum triguttatum Koch, and its distribution on Yorke Peninsula, South Australia.

Authors:  Helen P Waudby; Sophie Petit
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Willingness of veterinarians in Australia to recommend Q fever vaccination in veterinary personnel: Implications for workplace health and safety compliance.

Authors:  Emily Sellens; Jacqueline M Norris; Navneet K Dhand; Jane Heller; Lynne Hayes; Heather F Gidding; Harold Willaby; Nicholas Wood; Katrina L Bosward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Is a One Health Approach Utilized for Q Fever Control? A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Md Rezanur Rahaman; Adriana Milazzo; Helen Marshall; Peng Bi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Contributions of lipopolysaccharide and the type IVB secretion system to Coxiella burnetii vaccine efficacy and reactogenicity.

Authors:  Carrie M Long; Paul A Beare; Diane C Cockrell; Jonathan Fintzi; Mahelat Tesfamariam; Carl I Shaia; Robert A Heinzen
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 7.344

8.  Prophylaxis after exposure to Coxiella burnetii.

Authors:  Claire E Moodie; Herbert A Thompson; Martin I Meltzer; David L Swerdlow
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.883

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.