Alison E Field1, C Barr Taylor, Angela Celio, Graham A Colditz. 1. Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Alison.Field@TCH.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare self-report to interview assessment of bulimic behaviors among adolescents. METHOD: A sample of children in an ongoing study were recruited to complete in-depth telephone interviews in 1998 on bulimic behaviors (i.e., binge eating and purging). The sample comprised 449 girls and 50 boys. RESULTS: There was some over-reporting of bulimic behaviors on the 1998 questionnaire (asking about 1997-1998) compared with the interview that may have been due to the shorter and nonoverlapping time frame in the interview compared with the questionnaire. Despite the overestimation, the questionnaire did an excellent job at classifying girls who did not purge (negative predictive values [NPV]: 0.99) or binge eat (NPV = 0.98). When purging on the interview was compared with purging on either the 1998 or 1999 questionnaires, the sensitivity increased substantially from 0.73 to 0.93. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that a short self-report assessment can be used to screen children engaging in, or at risk of beginning to engage in, binge eating and purging. Copyright 2003 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 35: 86-92, 2004.
OBJECTIVE: To compare self-report to interview assessment of bulimic behaviors among adolescents. METHOD: A sample of children in an ongoing study were recruited to complete in-depth telephone interviews in 1998 on bulimic behaviors (i.e., binge eating and purging). The sample comprised 449 girls and 50 boys. RESULTS: There was some over-reporting of bulimic behaviors on the 1998 questionnaire (asking about 1997-1998) compared with the interview that may have been due to the shorter and nonoverlapping time frame in the interview compared with the questionnaire. Despite the overestimation, the questionnaire did an excellent job at classifying girls who did not purge (negative predictive values [NPV]: 0.99) or binge eat (NPV = 0.98). When purging on the interview was compared with purging on either the 1998 or 1999 questionnaires, the sensitivity increased substantially from 0.73 to 0.93. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that a short self-report assessment can be used to screen children engaging in, or at risk of beginning to engage in, binge eating and purging. Copyright 2003 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 35: 86-92, 2004.
Authors: Sabrina E Noel; Calum Mattocks; Pauline Emmett; Chris J Riddoch; Andrew R Ness; P K Newby Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Lien Goossens; Kamryn T Eddy; Rebecca Ringham; Andrea Goldschmidt; Susan Z Yanovski; Caroline Braet; Marsha D Marcus; Denise E Wilfley; Cara Olsen; Jack A Yanovski Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2007-12
Authors: Susan M Mason; Patricia A Frazier; S Bryn Austin; Bernard L Harlow; Benita Jackson; Nancy C Raymond; Janet W Rich-Edwards Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2017-12
Authors: Alison E Field; Kendrin R Sonneville; Nadia Micali; Ross D Crosby; Sonja A Swanson; Nan M Laird; Janet Treasure; Francesca Solmi; Nicholas J Horton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kendrin R Sonneville; Nicholas J Horton; Nadia Micali; Ross D Crosby; Sonja A Swanson; Francesca Solmi; Alison E Field Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: S Bryn Austin; Najat J Ziyadeh; Heather L Corliss; Margaret Rosario; David Wypij; Jess Haines; Carlos A Camargo; Alison E Field Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Alison E Field; Kendrin R Sonneville; Ross D Crosby; Sonja A Swanson; Kamryn T Eddy; Carlos A Camargo; Nicholas J Horton; Nadia Micali Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 16.193