D A Lawlor1, S Ebrahim, G Davey Smith. 1. Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. d.a.lawlor@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess the associations of lung function with insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We did a cross-sectional study of 3911 women who were 60 to 79 years old from 23 British towns, assessing the association of measures of lung function with insulin resistance (based on fasting insulin and glucose concentrations) and Type 2 diabetes (World Health Organisation diagnostic criteria). RESULTS: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were inversely associated with insulin resistance and prevalence of Type 2 diabetes. In age-adjusted analyses, the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score (insulin resistance) decreased by 5% (95% CI: 2-7%) for a one standard deviation increase in log FEV1 and by 8% (95% CI: 6-10%) for a one standard deviation increase in log FVC. With additional adjustment for height, smoking, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, physical activity, white cell count, adult social class, childhood social class and respiratory medication, these associations attenuated to 3% (95% CI: 1 to 5%) and 5% (95% CI: 3 to 8%). The fully adjusted odds ratio for diabetes prevalence was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.98) for a one standard deviation increase in log FEV1 and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.92) for a one standard deviation increase in log FVC. Forced expiratory flow in the central period of FVC was not associated with insulin resistance or diabetes. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Lung function measures which predominantly reflect lung volume are inversely associated with insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. These associations could reflect childhood exposures which affect lung growth and also programme insulin resistance.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess the associations of lung function with insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We did a cross-sectional study of 3911 women who were 60 to 79 years old from 23 British towns, assessing the association of measures of lung function with insulin resistance (based on fasting insulin and glucose concentrations) and Type 2 diabetes (World Health Organisation diagnostic criteria). RESULTS: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were inversely associated with insulin resistance and prevalence of Type 2 diabetes. In age-adjusted analyses, the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score (insulin resistance) decreased by 5% (95% CI: 2-7%) for a one standard deviation increase in log FEV1 and by 8% (95% CI: 6-10%) for a one standard deviation increase in log FVC. With additional adjustment for height, smoking, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, physical activity, white cell count, adult social class, childhood social class and respiratory medication, these associations attenuated to 3% (95% CI: 1 to 5%) and 5% (95% CI: 3 to 8%). The fully adjusted odds ratio for diabetes prevalence was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.98) for a one standard deviation increase in log FEV1 and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.92) for a one standard deviation increase in log FVC. Forced expiratory flow in the central period of FVC was not associated with insulin resistance or diabetes. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Lung function measures which predominantly reflect lung volume are inversely associated with insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. These associations could reflect childhood exposures which affect lung growth and also programme insulin resistance.
Authors: Diane S Allen; George T H Ellison; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Bianca L De Stavola; Ian S Fentiman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: D Gunnell; E Whitley; M N Upton; A McConnachie; G Davey Smith; G C M Watt Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: F Gómez Real; C Svanes; E H Björnsson; K A Franklin; K Franklin; D Gislason; T Gislason; A Gulsvik; C Janson; R Jögi; T Kiserud; D Norbäck; L Nyström; K Torén; T Wentzel-Larsen; E Omenaas Journal: Thorax Date: 2005-10-21 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Hwa Mu Lee; Yanglu Zhao; Michael A Liu; David Yanez; Mercedes Carnethon; R Graham Barr; Nathan D Wong Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Eva Schnabel; Chih-Mei Chen; Beate Koch; Stefan Karrasch; Rudolf A Jörres; Torsten Schäfer; Claus Vogelmeier; Ralf Ewert; Christoph Schäper; Henry Völzke; Anne Obst; Stephan B Felix; H-Erich Wichmann; Sven Gläser; Joachim Heinrich Journal: Respir Res Date: 2010-04-22
Authors: Samantha F Ehrlich; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Jun Shan; Assiamira Ferrara Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 19.112