Literature DB >> 14704815

[Current practice of immune prophylaxis and therapy in perforating keratoplasty. A survey of members of the Cornea Section of the German Ophthalmological Society].

E Bertelmann1, T Reinhard, U Pleyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Different strategies are currently used for prophylaxis and therapy of immunological transplant reactions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical practice in planning and treatment of perforating keratoplasty (KPL) in Germany.
METHOD: A questionnaire was sent out to 148 members of the cornea section of the German Ophthalmological Society. The return consisted of 69 (47%) questionnaires representing 69% of institutions, 39% of responses returned from institutions performing <50 KPL/year, 15% from institutions operating >100 KPL and 4% from centres performing >300 KPL/year.
RESULTS: Of the responders 13% currently never use HLA-matched grafts, 22% choose matched grafts in every risk KPL and 1.5% always use matched grafts. In normal risk situations 1.5% treat less than 2 weeks with topical steroids, 66% 3-12 months, 6.5% >1 year, 35% additionally treat with systemic steroids. Cyclosporine A (CsA) (92%) is besides steroids (80%) the most common systemic immunomodulatory agent in high risk situations, while methotrexate is used by only 9.5%. The duration of immunosuppressive therapy varies from <3 months (9%) up to >12 months (14%). The postoperative therapy after KPL in herpes includes topical (51%) and systemic aciclovir <3 (26%) and >3 weeks (67%) and additional systemic immunomodulatory agents (37%). The acute immune reaction is treated predominantly with steroids: topical (95%), subconjunctival (29%), intracameral (1.5%). Systemic steroids are given orally (48%) and intravenously (42%), 12% treat with topical CsA.
CONCLUSIONS: Besides therapeutic options that are accepted as common practice (e.g. systemic CsA) clinical practice varies widely. This may reflect the lack of evidence-based clinical observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14704815     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-003-0953-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  18 in total

1.  Current Australian practice in the prevention and management of corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  N H Barker; T R Henderson; C A Ross; D J Coster; K A Williams
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Beneficial effect of HLA-DR matching on the survival of corneal allografts.

Authors:  H J Völker-Dieben; F H Claas; G M Schreuder; R F Schipper; E Pels; G G Persijn; J Smits; J D'Amaro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Current practices in the prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection.

Authors:  J R Rinne; R D Stulting
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Corticosteroids in corneal graft rejection. Oral versus single pulse therapy.

Authors:  J C Hill; R Maske; P Watson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Ocular absorption of topically applied FK506 from liposomal and oil formulations in the rabbit eye.

Authors:  U Pleyer; S Lutz; W J Jusko; K D Nguyen; M Narawane; D Rückert; B J Mondino; V H Lee; K Nguyen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Conclusions of the corneal transplant follow up study. Collaborating Surgeons.

Authors:  A Vail; S M Gore; B A Bradley; D L Easty; C A Rogers; W J Armitage
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Clinical and surgical factors influencing corneal graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators.

Authors:  A Vail; S M Gore; B A Bradley; D L Easty; C A Rogers; W J Armitate
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Randomised controlled trial of corticosteroid regimens in endothelial corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  T Hudde; D C Minassian; D F Larkin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Tacrolimus (FK506) in the management of high-risk corneal and limbal grafts.

Authors:  C M Sloper; R J Powell; H S Dua
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Intraocular availability of topically applied mycophenolate mofetil in rabbits.

Authors:  Sigrid Knapp; Eckart Bertelmann; Christian Hartmann; Sigrid Keipert; Uwe Pleyer
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.671

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Immunomodulation in penetrating keratoplasty. Current status and perspectives].

Authors:  U Pleyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Classification of biomedical research reports as a reference for evidence-based medicine in ophthalmology. A survey considering as example the journal Der Ophthalmologe].

Authors:  H P N Scholl; M Fleckenstein; T U Krohne; F G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Immune suppression following perforating keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; A Reis; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Adult keratoplasty: has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years?

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  [Ranking of systemic steroids after normal-risk keratoplasty. Results of a randomized prospective study].

Authors:  S Mayweg; T Reinhard; H Spelsberg; A Reis; E Godehardt; R Sundmacher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  [Topical immunosuppressives after penetrating keratoplasty].

Authors:  F Birnbaum; A Reis; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  [Significance of cyclosporin A absorption for effective immunomodulatory therapy after high-risk keratoplasty].

Authors:  N Bailly; I Dunewa; P Schlattmann; P W Rieck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.