Literature DB >> 14704242

Clinical examination and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in vaginal vault prolapse.

Eduard Cortes1, Wendy M N Reid, Kavita Singh, Leslie Berger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of vaginal apex prolapse in women with previous hysterectomy.
METHODS: Clinical examinations were performed on 51 women presenting with symptoms of prolapse. A preoperative dynamic MRI assessment was performed. The mid pubic line was the reference level used for prolapse grading. The parameters of analysis included 1). correlation by compartments of clinical and MRI grading of prolapse, 2). assessment of the accuracy of clinical examination of the middle compartment, and 3). identification of any additional information provided by MRI. All MRI films were analyzed and validated by the same two observers.
RESULTS: Analysis of each compartment separately revealed poor correlation between clinical and MRI assessment. Of the 51 cases with clinical vault prolapse, 27 (52.9%) cases were clinically overdiagnosed, 3 (6%) were underdiagnosed, and there was agreement in 21 (41.1%) when compared with MRI findings. Postoperative follow-up of the 18 (85%) patients who underwent colposacropexy after intraoperative assessment revealed the presence of cystocele in 4 (26.6%) occasions and rectocele in 3 (20%), which had been detected on MRI but not confirmed intraoperatively.
CONCLUSION: There is poor correlation between clinical and MRI findings when assessing vaginal apex prolapse. Magnetic resonance imaging allows the identification of other prolapsing compartments and may be a complementary diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of complex vaginal apex prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14704242     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000102704.29607.FC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging.

Authors:  Courtney A Woodfield; Brittany Star Hampton; Vivian Sung; Jeffrey M Brody
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-25

2.  POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Kirsten B Kluivers; Jan C M Hendriks; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-02-17

Review 3.  A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

4.  Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Luyun Chen; Zhuowei Xue; Emily M English; Dee E Fenner; Kara Gaetke-Udager; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The clinical value of magnetic resonance defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  V Piloni; M Bergamasco; G Melara; P Garavello
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Automated contour tracking and trajectory classification of pelvic organs on dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Iman Nekooeimehr; Susana Lai-Yuen; Paul Bao; Alfredo Weitzenfeld; Stuart Hart
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI?

Authors:  Julie A Tumbarello; Yvonne Hsu; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Suzan Rohrer; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Relevance of open magnetic resonance imaging position (sitting and standing) to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Marwa Abdulaziz; Alex Kavanagh; Lynn Stothers; Andrew J Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Ramage; C Simillis; C Yen; C Lutterodt; S Qiu; E Tan; C Kontovounisios; P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Azubuike Uzoma; K A Farag
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.