Literature DB >> 14704215

Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity.

Marina Pavlova1, Werner Lutzenberger, Alexander Sokolov, Niels Birbaumer.   

Abstract

Recognition of biological motion is one of the essential ingredients of human evolutionary survival. When biological motion is revealed solely by a set of light dots on the joints of an invisible human figure, the perceptual system reliably distinguishes it from similar configurations. Here, we assessed the changes in neuromagnetic cortical responses during visual perception of biological motion. Healthy humans saw a randomized set of stimuli consisting of a point-light canonical walker and a scrambled configuration in which the spatial positions of dots were randomly rearranged on the screen. In separate runs, configurations were presented either within an upright or inverted (180 degrees ) orientation in the image plane. Participants performed a one-back repetition task lifting a forefinger in response to the second of two consecutive identical stimuli of each type. Both recognizable upright and non-recognizable inverted walkers evoke enhancements in oscillatory gamma brain activity (25-30 Hz) over the left occipital cortices as early as 100 ms from stimulus onset. Only a recognizable upright walker, however, yields further consecutive peaks over the parietal (130 ms) and right temporal (170 ms) lobes. Scrambled displays do not elicit any increases in the gamma response. The stimulus-specific time course and topographic dynamics of cortical oscillatory activity indicate that the brain rapidly dissociates spatial coherence and meaning revealed through biological movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14704215     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  20 in total

1.  Structural and effective brain connectivity underlying biological motion detection.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; Peter Zeidman; Michael Erb; Philippe Ryvlin; Karl J Friston; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interactions between visual and motor areas during the recognition of plausible actions as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Anastasia Pavlidou; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Hippocampal temporal-parietal junction interaction in the production of psychotic symptoms: a framework for understanding the schizophrenic syndrome.

Authors:  Cynthia G Wible
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Differential visually-induced gamma-oscillations in human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Eishi Asano; Masaaki Nishida; Miho Fukuda; Robert Rothermel; Csaba Juhász; Sandeep Sood
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Neural correlates of apparent motion perception of impoverished facial stimuli: a comparison of ERP and ERSP activity.

Authors:  Alejandra Rossi; Francisco J Parada; Artemy Kolchinsky; Aina Puce
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Gender affects body language reading.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; Samuel Krüger; Paul Enck; Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-02

7.  Direction of Biological Motion Affects Early Brain Activation: A Link with Social Cognition.

Authors:  Alan John Pegna; Elise Gehring; Georg Meyer; Marzia Del Zotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deficient biological motion perception in schizophrenia: results from a motion noise paradigm.

Authors:  Jejoong Kim; Daniel Norton; Ryan McBain; Dost Ongur; Yue Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-04

9.  Differential orientation effect in the neural response to interacting biological motion of two agents.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirai; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Speed of human biological form and motion processing.

Authors:  George Buzzell; Laura Chubb; Ashley S Safford; James C Thompson; Craig G McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.