Literature DB >> 14703758

Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.

Pascal Magne1, Urs C Belser.   

Abstract

This study used 2-D finite element modeling to simulate cuspal flexure and stresses at the surface and tooth-restoration interface of a restored maxillary molar using three restorative materials; the influence of four inlay/onlay preparation configurations on stress distribution within the complex was also investigated. A buccolingual cross-section of an intact molar was digitized and used to create 2-D models restored with different restorative materials (feldspathic porcelain, high- and low-elastic modulus composites) and tooth preparations (small and large inlays, small and large onlays). Two simulated 25-N oblique loads were applied to the cusps. The tangential stress for each finite element node located at the tooth surface, interfacial stress, and relative cuspal flexure were analyzed. All materials and tooth preparations exhibited similar surface tangential stress patterns, with a definite compressive area at the external cusp ridges, a tensile zone at the occlusal surface, and compression stress peaks at the CEJ. The low-elastic modulus composite showed reduced tensile stresses at its surface but increased tension at the dentin-adhesive interface when compared to ceramics. All types of onlays demonstrated a majority of compressive interfacial stresses, while inlays showed a majority of tensile stresses. The interfacial tension at the dentin level increased with the flexibility of the restorative material. Only the large ceramic onlay displayed almost pure compression at the interface. Composite-restored teeth exhibited increased crown flexure, while porcelain-restored teeth showed increased crown stiffness. Porcelain inlays/onlays featured more detrimental stresses at the occlusal surface but better potential protection against debonding at the dentin-restoration interface compared to composite inlays/onlays. Ceramic onlays/overlays seem to represent an effective answer to restore severely damaged posterior teeth.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14703758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Stefan Schultheis; Martin Wolkewitz; Yu Zhang; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Fatigue behavior and stress distribution of molars restored with MOD inlays with and without deep margin elevation.

Authors:  Elisa Donaria Aboucauch Grassi; Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Renan Vaz Machry; Luiz Felipe Valandro; Nathalia de Carvalho Ramos; Eduardo Bresciani; Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of different irrigating solutions and endodontic sealers on bond strength of the dentin-post interface with and without defects.

Authors:  Felice R Grassi; Carmine Pappalettere; Mariasevera Di Comite; Massimo Corsalini; Giorgio Mori; Andrea Ballini; Vito Crincoli; Francesco Pettini; Biagio Rapone; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hélène Fron Chabouis; Caroline Prot; Cyrille Fonteneau; Karim Nasr; Olivier Chabreron; Stéphane Cazier; Christian Moussally; Alexandre Gaucher; Inès Khabthani Ben Jaballah; Renaud Boyer; Jean-François Leforestier; Aurore Caumont-Prim; Florence Chemla; Louis Maman; Cathy Nabet; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Diastema Closure in Anterior Teeth Using a Posterior Matrix.

Authors:  Ayush Goyal; Vineeta Nikhil; Ritu Singh
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-10-13

6.  Direct restorative treatment of missing maxillary laterals with composite laminate veneer: a case report.

Authors:  Bora Bagis; Elif Aydoğan; Yildirim H Bagis
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2008-06-13

7.  The effect of amount of lost tooth structure and restorative technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars.

Authors:  Mahshid Mohammadi Bassir; Akram Labibzadeh; Fatemeh Mollaverdi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09

8.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with direct and indirect composite restorations.

Authors:  Hassan Torabzadeh; Amir Ghasemi; Atoosa Dabestani; Sara Razmavar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  The Influence of Composite Thickness with or without Fibers on Fracture Resistance of Direct Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Hassan Torabzadeh; Amir Ghassemi; Masoud Sanei; Sara Razmavar; Seyedeh Mahsa Sheikh-Al-Eslamian
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-07-05

10.  Evaluation of Temperature and Stress Distribution on 2 Different Post Systems Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Yalçın Değer; Özkan Adigüzel; Senem Yiğit Özer; Sadullah Kaya; Zelal Seyfioğlu Polat; Bejna Bozyel
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.