Literature DB >> 14703269

An ESID case study at the federal level.

James Emshoff1, Craig Blakely, Denis Gray, Susan Jakes, Paul Brounstein, Judy Coulter, Steve Gardner.   

Abstract

The D (dissemination) phase of the ESID model has been often overlooked in our efforts to create innovative and widespread social change. The process of replicating successful social innovations is both a prerequisite for dissemination (in order to assess the consistency of effects) and an obvious outcome of a successful dissemination effort. Fidelity, the extent to which a replicated program is implemented in a manner consistent with the original program model, is an important dimension of replication. This study was designed to provide empirical data related to three questions. Can complex social programs be implemented with fidelity? How much fidelity is appropriate or desired? What are the organizational dynamics of adoption with fidelity? Data were collected from grantees of a national replication initiative funded by the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Data suggest that high fidelity can be achieved, at least in the context in which programs are mandated to do so as part of the funding agreement and are given technical assistance in achieving fidelity. Secondly, programs perceived high fidelity as having positive effects on the program and its participants, a finding consistent with a limited assessment of the relationship of program outcomes and fidelity. Finally, much was learned about the human and organizational dynamics of replicating with fidelity. Implications for policy and direction regarding replication are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14703269     DOI: 10.1023/b:ajcp.0000004753.88247.0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Community Psychol        ISSN: 0091-0562


  6 in total

1.  Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation.

Authors:  Cady Berkel; Anne M Mauricio; Erin Schoenfelder; Irwin N Sandler
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-03

2.  Community and team member factors that influence the early phase functioning of community prevention teams: the PROSPER project.

Authors:  Mark T Greenberg; Mark E Feinberg; Sarah Meyer-Chilenski; Richard L Spoth; Cleve Redmond
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2007-12-06

3.  Community and team member factors that influence the operations phase of local prevention teams: the PROSPER Project.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Sarah M Chilenski; Mark T Greenberg; Richard L Spoth; Cleve Redmond
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2007-06-30

4.  Understanding the art and science of implementation in the SAAF efficacy trial.

Authors:  Cady Berkel; Velma McBride Murry; Kathryn J Roulston; Gene H Brody
Journal:  Health Educ (Lond)       Date:  2013

5.  Personality and community prevention teams: Dimensions of team leader and member personality predicting team functioning.

Authors:  Mark E Feinberg; Ji-Yeon Kim; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-08-22

6.  Therapeutic community drug treatment success in Peru: a follow-up outcome study.

Authors:  Knowlton Johnson; Zhenfeng Pan; Linda Young; Jude Vanderhoff; Steve Shamblen; Thom Browne; Ken Linfield; Geetha Suresh
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2008-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.