Literature DB >> 14702501

Measuring the quality of children's health care: a prerequisite to action.

Denise Dougherty1, Lisa A Simpson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the availability and use of quality measures for children's health care, highlight promising developments, and develop recommendations for future action steps by the child health quality measurement and improvement fields, pediatrics, and the national quality of care enterprise generally. STUDY
DESIGN: Two-day invitational expert meeting, informed by 3 commissioned articles.
RESULTS: Quality of care for children is far less than optimal. A number of measures are available for measuring children's health care quality on a regular basis, although measures are scarce at least in many areas (eg, pediatric patient safety, end-of-life-care, mental health care, oral health care, neonatal care, care for school-aged children, and coordination of care). Many of the available measures are not being applied regularly to measure the quality of children's health care; barriers to implementation include lack of an information infrastructure that is child- and quality-friendly and lack of public support for improving children's health care quality. To improve the availability and use of quality measures for accountability and improvement, meeting participants recommended that at least 4 activities be national priorities: 1) build public support for quality measurement and improvement in children's health care; 2) create the information technology infrastructure that can facilitate collection and use of data; 3) improve the reliability, validity, and feasibility of existing measures; and 4) create the evidence base for measures development and quality improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Although substantial progress has been made in the development of quality measures and the implementation of quality-improvement strategies for children's health care, interest in quality of care for children lags behind that for adult conditions and disorders. Making significant progress will require not only sustained attention by those concerned about improving children's health and health care but also activities to build a broad base of support among the public and key health care decision-makers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14702501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  Paediatric palliative care research in Canada: Development and progress of a new emerging team.

Authors:  Lynn Straatman; Susan Cadell; Betty Davies; Harold Siden; Rose Steele
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Medical home transformation in pediatric primary care--what drives change?

Authors:  Jeanne W McAllister; W Carl Cooley; Jeanne Van Cleave; Alexy Arauz Boudreau; Karen Kuhlthau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Adherence to guidelines for youths with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Beth Waitzfelder; Catherine Pihoker; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Doug Case; Andrea Anderson; Ronny A Bell; Jean M Lawrence; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Giuseppina Imperatore; Debra Standiford; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Dana Dabelea; Michael Seid
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  The impact of statistical choices on neonatal intensive care unit quality ratings based on nosocomial infection rates.

Authors:  Henry C Lee; Alyna T Chien; Naomi S Bardach; Ted Clay; Jeffrey B Gould; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-05

5.  The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's children's health research portfolio.

Authors:  Dana Schultz; Michael Seid; Michael A Stoto; Jane McClure Burstain
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-11-15

6.  A risk adjusted method for comparing adverse outcomes among practitioners in pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Lisa Bergersen; Kimberlee Gauvreau; James E Lock; Kathy J Jenkins
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Quantitative pediatric vision screening in primary care settings in Alabama.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Terry C Wall; John S Tootle; Sharina D Person; Robert E Kristofco
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  A best-worst scaling experiment to identify patient-centered claims-based outcomes for evaluation of pediatric antipsychotic monitoring programs.

Authors:  Thomas I Mackie; Katherine M Kovacs; Cassandra Simmel; Stephen Crystal; Sheree Neese-Todd; Ayse Akincigil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.402

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.