Literature DB >> 14701900

Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, below a rolled-up sleeve, or over a sleeve.

Ernesto Kahan1, John Yaphe, Hadas Knaani-Levinz, Michael A Weingarten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the effect of measuring blood pressure below subjects' rolled-up sleeves, over the sleeve, or on the bare arm. This is an important day-to-day issue for the busy GP.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 201 subjects in family practice clinics and residents of a senior citizens' home. A digital device was used in all cases. Each participant underwent three blood pressure measurements in each of the following conditions in random order: cuff on bare arm; cuff over the sleeve; and cuff below the rolled-up sleeve. Differences between measurements were plotted against the mean blood pressure. Confounding factors controlled for were age, sex, clothing pressure and skin-fold thickness.
RESULTS: Differences in mean blood pressure readings between the clothed and bare arm were 0.5 mmHg (SD 7.5) for systolic pressure and 1 mmHg (SD 5) for diastolic pressure; neither difference was significant. However, in hypertensive subjects (>140 mmHg systolic), although the mean difference remained small (systolic pressure, 2 mmHg, SD 10), the range of difference for individual subjects was -32 mmHg to +22 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: The degree of clothing under the sphygmomanometer cuff does not have a clinically important effect on the blood pressure measurement. In patients known or found to be hypertensive, measurement on the bare arm is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14701900     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmg618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  6 in total

1.  Measuring blood pressure: a call to bare arms?

Authors:  Donald W McKay
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The role of home BP monitoring: Answers to 10 common questions.

Authors:  Sonal J Patil; Richelle J Koopman; Jeffery Belden; Michael LeFevre
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  A comparison of blood pressure measurement over a sleeved arm versus a bare arm.

Authors:  Grace Ma; Norman Sabin; Martin Dawes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  The effect of clothes on blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Nurcan Ertug; Tugba Cakal; Seyda Busra Ozturk; Muhammet Verim
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Differences in blood pressure measurements obtained using an automatic oscillometric sphygmomanometer depending on clothes-wearing status.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Ki; Mi Kyeong Oh; Soo Hee Lee
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2013-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.