Richard M Lynch1, Robert Robertson. 1. Accident and Emergency Department, Pontefract General Infirmary and Hull Royal Infirmary, Friarwood Lane, Pontefract, WF8 1PN, UK. rlynch@tinyworld.co.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since its introduction in 1977, intravenous N-acetylcysteine has become the treatment of choice for paracetamol overdose. The aim of our study was to investigate the existence of predictive factors in the likelihood of developing anaphylactoid reactions to N-acetylcysteine. METHODS: Prospective case-controlled study of all patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) between January 1997 and June 1999, and who were treated with intravenous N-acetylcysteine on the short stay observation ward. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients received N-acetylcysteine infusions; thirty-one (48.4%) developed an anaphylactoid reaction. Nineteen patients who reacted were commenced on N-acetylcysteine prior to receipt of paracetamol concentrations and fifteen (48.4%) were categorised as high-risk. Seventy-one percent of reactions occurred within the first 15 min. Thirteen patients who developed a reaction, had levels which fell below the treatment lines. The levels of a further nine reactors lay above the high-risk but below the normal-risk lines. Only five patients who reacted had levels above the normal-risk line. Two of the patients who reacted to intravenous N-acetylcysteine presented at a later date with a further paracetamol overdose. Both required treatment with intravenous N-acetylcysteine, the first bag being infused over one hour. Neither developed a reaction. CONCLUSION: We report a substantially higher incidence of anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine than has previously been documented. It appears that these reactions are more likely to occur in high-risk patients, when plasma paracetamol concentrations were found to be below the treatment lines and in late presenters. Perhaps, giving the loading dose of N-acetylcysteine over 60 min could reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
INTRODUCTION: Since its introduction in 1977, intravenous N-acetylcysteine has become the treatment of choice for paracetamoloverdose. The aim of our study was to investigate the existence of predictive factors in the likelihood of developing anaphylactoid reactions to N-acetylcysteine. METHODS: Prospective case-controlled study of all patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) between January 1997 and June 1999, and who were treated with intravenous N-acetylcysteine on the short stay observation ward. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients received N-acetylcysteine infusions; thirty-one (48.4%) developed an anaphylactoid reaction. Nineteen patients who reacted were commenced on N-acetylcysteine prior to receipt of paracetamol concentrations and fifteen (48.4%) were categorised as high-risk. Seventy-one percent of reactions occurred within the first 15 min. Thirteen patients who developed a reaction, had levels which fell below the treatment lines. The levels of a further nine reactors lay above the high-risk but below the normal-risk lines. Only five patients who reacted had levels above the normal-risk line. Two of the patients who reacted to intravenous N-acetylcysteine presented at a later date with a further paracetamoloverdose. Both required treatment with intravenous N-acetylcysteine, the first bag being infused over one hour. Neither developed a reaction. CONCLUSION: We report a substantially higher incidence of anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous N-acetylcysteine than has previously been documented. It appears that these reactions are more likely to occur in high-risk patients, when plasma paracetamol concentrations were found to be below the treatment lines and in late presenters. Perhaps, giving the loading dose of N-acetylcysteine over 60 min could reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
Authors: Vikhyat S Bebarta; Louise Kao; Blake Froberg; Richard F Clark; Eric Lavonas; Ming Qi; Joao Delgado; John McDonagh; Tom Arnold; Oladapo Odujebe; Gerry O'Malley; Claudia Lares; Elizabeth Aguilera; Richard Dart; Kennon Heard; Chriss Stanford; Jamie Kokko; Greg Bogdan; Carrie Mendoza; Sara Mlynarchek; Sean Rhyee; Jason Hoppe; William Haur; Hock Heng Tan; Nguyen Nguyen Tran; Shawn Varney; Amy Zosel; Jennifer Buchanan; Mohammed Al-Helial Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.467
Authors: George P Bailey; Javad Najafi; Muhammad E M O Elamin; W Stephen Waring; Simon H L Thomas; John R H Archer; David M Wood; Paul I Dargan Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Mark Yarema; Puja Chopra; Marco L A Sivilotti; David Johnson; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Benoit Bailey; Charlemaigne Victorino; Sophie Gosselin; Roy Purssell; Margaret Thompson; Daniel Spyker; Barry Rumack Journal: J Med Toxicol Date: 2018-02-08
Authors: H K Ruben Thanacoody; Alasdair Gray; James W Dear; Judy Coyle; Euan A Sandilands; David J Webb; Steff Lewis; Michael Eddleston; Simon Hl Thomas; D Nicholas Bateman Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 2.483