Literature DB >> 1470026

Environmental effects of genotoxins (eco-genotoxicology).

F E Würgler1, P G Kramers.   

Abstract

Genotoxic chemicals can damage the genetic material of humans as well as that of organisms living in the environment. With respect to adverse effects, alterations induced in the germ line, leading to alterations in the genetic make-up of populations, are of primary concern in ecosystems, because somatic changes, even if they lead to a loss of individuals, will not be critical in populations with a large reproductive surplus. This is different in human toxicology where genetic alterations in germ cells as well as in somatic cells of any individual are of concern. Increased frequencies of mutations and related genetic alterations in the gene pools of individual species or populations in ecosystems have to be judged against the background of spontaneous mutations that have enabled species to survive and adapt in changing environments since the beginning of life on our planet, and which have played an important role as the substrate for evolutionary developments. Examples of the selection of altered phenotypes (and genotypes) in response to environmental pollution and environmental stress are melanism in moth populations, metal resistance in plants, insecticide resistance in insects and malaria resistance in humans. Pollution, in general, can represent a stress factor selectively leading to a change in genetic make-up. In addition, environmental genotoxins can directly alter gene pools. A change in the genetic constitution may be advantageous for certain populations living in stressful conditions, but may present a disadvantage for others, including man.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1470026     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/7.5.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of ecological risks linked to the discharge of saline industrial effluent into a river.

Authors:  Yves Perrodin; Laurence Volatier; Christine Bazin; Jean-Claude Boisson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Parental exposure to methyl methane sulfonate of three-spined stickleback: contribution of DNA damage in male and female germ cells to further development impairment in progeny.

Authors:  R Santos; M Palos-Ladeiro; A Besnard; J Reggio; E Vulliet; J M Porcher; S Bony; W Sanchez; A Devaux
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Genotoxicity potential of a new natural formicide.

Authors:  Sylvie Cotelle; Renan C Testolin; Anne-Sophie Foltête; Georgiana Bossardi-Rissardi; Rosilene A Silveira; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Elevated mercury and PCB concentrations in Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) collected near a formerly used defense site on Sivuqaq, Alaska.

Authors:  Renee Jordan-Ward; Frank A von Hippel; Guomao Zheng; Amina Salamova; Danielle Dillon; Jesse Gologergen; Tiffany Immingan; Elliott Dominguez; Pamela Miller; David Carpenter; John H Postlethwait; Samuel Byrne; C Loren Buck
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 10.753

5.  Assessment of sediment ecotoxicity and genotoxicity in freshwater laboratory microcosms.

Authors:  B Clément; A Devaux; Y Perrodin; M Danjean; M Ghidini-Fatus
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Soil genotoxicity assessment--results of an interlaboratory study on the Vicia micronucleus assay in the context of ISO standardization.

Authors:  Sylvie Cotelle; Adrien Dhyèvre; Serge Muller; Pascale Chenon; Nicolas Manier; Pascal Pandard; Abdelwahad Echairi; Jérôme Silvestre; Maritxu Guiresse; Eric Pinelli; Lucia Giorgetti; Meri Barbafieri; Valéria C Silva; Fernanda Engel; Claudemir M Radetski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Biomarkers in natural fish populations indicate adverse biological effects of offshore oil production.

Authors:  Lennart Balk; Ketil Hylland; Tomas Hansson; Marc H G Berntssen; Jonny Beyer; Grete Jonsson; Alf Melbye; Merete Grung; Bente E Torstensen; Jan Fredrik Børseth; Halldora Skarphedinsdottir; Jarle Klungsøyr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Genetic and molecular ecotoxicology: a research framework.

Authors:  S Anderson; W Sadinski; L Shugart; P Brussard; M Depledge; T Ford; J Hose; J Stegeman; W Suk; I Wirgin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Evaluation of ecotoxicological risks related to the Discharge of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) in a periurban River.

Authors:  Ruth Angerville; Yves Perrodin; Christine Bazin; Evens Emmanuel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Comparative DNA damage and repair in echinoderm coelomocytes exposed to genotoxicants.

Authors:  Ameena H El-Bibany; Andrea G Bodnar; Helena C Reinardy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.