Literature DB >> 14699281

Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States.

Xuemei Luo1, Ricardo Pietrobon, Shawn X Sun, Gordon G Liu, Lloyd Hey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States, calculate the incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these individuals, and describe health care expenditure patterns of individuals with back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a lack of updated information on health care expenditures and expenditure patterns for individuals with back pain in the United States.
METHODS: This study used data from the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a national survey on health care utilization and expenditures. Total health care expenditures and per-capita expenditures among individuals with back pain were calculated. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate the incremental expenditures attributable to back pain. The expenditure patterns were examined by stratifying individuals with back pain by sociodemographic characteristics and medical diagnosis, and calculating per-capita expenditures for each stratum.
RESULTS: In 1998, total health care expenditures incurred by individuals with back pain in the United States reached 90.7 billion dollars and total incremental expenditures attributable to back pain among these persons were approximately 26.3 billion dollars. On average, individuals with back pain incurred health care expenditures about 60% higher than individuals without back pain (3,498 dollars vs. 2,178 dollars). Among back pain individuals, at least 75% of service expenditures were attributed to those with top 25% expenditure, and per-capita expenditures were generally higher for those who were older, female, white, medically insured, or suffered from disc disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Health care expenditures for back pain in the United States in 1998 were substantial. The expenditures demonstrated wide variations among individuals with different clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14699281     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000105527.13866.0F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  190 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Fatemeh Yazdi; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Anita Gross; Maurits Van Tulder; Lina Santaguida; Joel Gagnier; Carlo Ammendolia; Trish Dryden; Steve Doucette; Becky Skidmore; Raymond Daniel; Thomas Ostermann; Sophia Tsouros
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Complementary and integrative healthcare for patients with mechanical low back pain in a U.S. hospital setting.

Authors:  Taeho Greg Rhee; Brent D Leininger; Neha Ghildayal; Roni L Evans; Jeffery A Dusek; Pamela Jo Johnson
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  Identifying episodes of back pain using medical expenditures panel survey data: patient experience, use of services, and chronicity.

Authors:  Monica Smith
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective.

Authors:  Benjamin W Friedman; Mikaela Chilstrom; Polly E Bijur; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effect of spinal manipulative therapy on mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pilot randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Bryan M Bond; Chris D Kinslow; Adam W Yoder; Wen Liu
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 6.  Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma.

Authors:  Janna Friedly; Christopher Standaert; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.784

7.  Low back pain.

Authors:  W G Bradley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham Foot Study.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Alyssa B Dufour; Jody L Riskowski; Howard J Hillstrom; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

10.  Low Back Pain Prevalence and Related Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors: A Study Using Data From the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Scott Haldeman; Ming-Lun Lu; Dean Baker
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.