Literature DB >> 14699215

Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis following renal artery stenting.

Nicolas W Shammas1, Matthew J Kapalis, Eric J Dippel, Michael J Jerin, Jon H Lemke, Pragnesh Patel, Melodee Harris.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Percutaneous stenting has become the procedure of choice for treatment of obstructive atherosclerotic renal artery (RA) disease. Restenosis, however, continues to be in the range of 15-25% of treated vessels. In this study, clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis were assessed. Of 132 vessels included, fifty-eight were followed for restenosis using duplex Doppler (n=15), conventional angiogram (n=33) or multislice computed tomography (CT) angiogram (n=10). Fifteen vessels (26%) met the criteria for restenosis (lesion > or =50% by conventional or CT angiography or >60% by Doppler) at a follow-up range of 2-20 months (5% <2 months; 68% 3-12 months; 27% 13-20 months). Cox Regression analyses were performed for selected variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. History of smoking [odds ratio (OR), 6.6:1; p=0.005] and time to evaluate for restenosis were independent predictors of the occurrence of restenosis. Also, a high restenosis rate (40%) was seen in vessels < or =4 mm in diameter (n=20) in contrast to larger vessels (n=38) >4 mm (18.4%). Although statistical significance was not reached (possibly because of the small sample size), clinically this is a significant finding. A significant drop in systolic (-15.6 mmHg) and diastolic (-6.2 mmHg) blood pressures was seen following RA stenting with no significant change in the total number of antihypertensives used (2.4 versus 2.5 for pre- and post-renal stenting, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Restenosis occurred in 26% of successfully stented RAs. History of smoking, time to evaluate for restenosis and small vessels (< or =4 mm) were predictors of its occurrence. Clinically, a significant drop in blood pressure was seen with RA stenting without a change in the total number of antihypertensives on follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14699215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical insights into the diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery disease.

Authors:  Michael J Bloch; Jan Basile
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Restenosis after renal artery angioplasty and stenting: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Matthew A Corriere; Matthew S Edwards; Jeffrey D Pearce; Jeanette S Andrews; Randolph L Geary; Kimberley J Hansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  First use of cryoplasty to treat in-stent renal artery restenosis.

Authors:  John L Jefferies; Kathryn Dougherty; Zvonimir Krajcer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Renal Artery Stenosis: Optimal Therapy and Indications for Revascularization.

Authors:  Sandeep M Patel; Jun Li; Sahil A Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  5 Years Experience With Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents as Primary Intervention in Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Chelsea C Estrada; Muzammil Musani; Frank Darras; Heesuck Suh; Mersema T Abate; Anil Mani; Edward P Nord
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-01-17

6.  Analysis of renal artery morphometery in adults: A study conducted by using Multidetector computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Maria Mohiuddin; Arsalan Manzoor; Muhammad Ali; Nuzhat Hassan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.