Literature DB >> 1469901

The natural history of intraepithelial neoplasia: relevance to the search for intermediate endpoint biomarkers.

C W Boone1, G J Kelloff, V E Steele.   

Abstract

The development of carcinomas, defined as invasive epithelial neoplasms, is preceded by a preinvasive stage termed intraepithelial neoplasia that typically lasts for years. Intraepithelial neoplasia is the target tissue for the action of chemopreventive agents and the site where biomarkers frequently develop. The term "dysplasia" refers to the morphological alterations that characterize intraepithelial neoplasia and, according to many authors, consists of seven basic changes that are the same for the majority of epithelia. These are increased nuclear size, abnormal nuclear shape, increased nuclear stain uptake, nuclear pleomorphism (increased variation in size, shape, and stain uptake), increased mitoses, abnormal mitoses, and disordered or absent differentiation. Clonal evolution appears to begin early in the neoplastic process during intraepithelial neoplasia. The use of intraepithelial neoplasia as an intermediate endpoint biomarker requires that effective chemopreventive agents cause it to regress. Two examples are the regression of dysplastic oral leukoplakia produced by beta-carotene and the regression of colonic polyps in familial polyposis patients following treatment with the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug sulindac. There is a critical need to identify and develop biomarkers that correlate with the appearance and regression of intraepithelial neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1469901     DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240501104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl        ISSN: 0733-1959


  3 in total

1.  Prospective detection of cervical dysplasia with scanning angle-resolved low coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Wesley Y Kendall; Derek Ho; Kengyeh Chu; Michael Zinaman; Daryl Wieland; Kandis Moragne; Adam Wax
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Cancer biomarkers: selecting the right drug for the right patient.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; Caroline C Sigman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Prevalence of aneuploidy, overexpressed ER, and overexpressed EGFR in random breast aspirates of women at high and low risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C J Fabian; C Zalles; S Kamel; B F Kimler; R McKittrick; A S Tranin; S Zeiger; W P Moore; R S Hassanein; C Simon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.