Literature DB >> 14698776

Performance of two blue light-emitting-diode dental light curing units with distance and irradiation-time.

Adrian W Bennett1, David C Watts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of two blue light-emitting-diode (LED) curing units, in terms of their spectral output and irradiance and the depth of cure (dcure) produced in standard hybrid and modified composites, compared with a conventional quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light curing unit.
METHODS: The following light curing units (LCUs) were studied: Elipar-Freelight-1 LED (LED-1) 3 M-ESPE, Ultralume-2 LED (LED-2) Optident, and the Optilux-500 QTH (QTH-1) Sybron-Kerr. For each LCU, using a UV-visible spectrophotometer, the output spectrum was measured and the irradiance of emitted light as a function of source-detector distance. Three composites were studied of similar formulation but differing in their initiator concentrations and/or opacity. These were: Tetric Ceram (A3), Tetric Ceram HB containing an additional photoinitiator responding to approximately 435 nm (A3) and Tetric Ceram Bleach (L). dcure was measured using a calibrated digital needle-penetrometer, as a function of source-specimen distance and for irradiance periods of 10, 20 and 40 s.
RESULTS: Each unit delivered a single peak in the blue region of the visible spectrum. The wavelength maxima for LED-1, LED-2 and QTH-1 were 486.4, 458.2 and 495.2 nm, respectively. Cure-depth (dcure) values varied significantly (p<0.001) with irradiance times and source-specimen distance for both LED and QTH sources. The percentage reduction in dcure values resulting from LED versus QTH irradiance increased with source-specimen distance. SIGNIFICANCE: The LED-LCUs had an energy-efficient spectral output for conventional composite curing but had a lower irradiance compared with the QTH-LCU, leading to reduced performance in depths of cure. Design improvements to provide greater irradiance from the LED-1 and to a lesser extent LED-2, should result in increased performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14698776     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00070-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of microleakages of photo-cured composites using three different light sources: halogen lamp, LED and argon laser: an in vitro study.

Authors:  M Tielemans; Ph Compere; S O Geerts; M Lamy; M Limme; R J G De Moor; K I M Delmé; M F Bertrand; E Rompen; S Nammour
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques.

Authors:  Vania Stephanie Sánchez Gamarra; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Júnior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  The effect of irradiation distance on microhardness of resin composites cured with different light curing units.

Authors:  Isil Cekic-Nagas; Ferhan Egilmez; Gulfem Ergun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-10

4.  Effectiveness of light emitting diode and halogen light curing units for curing microhybrid and nanocomposites.

Authors:  Shwetha Choudhary; Bs Suprabha
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-05

5.  Curing efficacy of light emitting diodes of dental curing units.

Authors:  Seyed Mostafa Mousavinasab; Ian Meyers
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2009-03-16

6.  Light transmittance of zirconia as a function of thickness and microhardness of resin cements under different thicknesses of zirconia.

Authors:  Isil Cekic-Nagas; Ferhan Egilmez; Gulfem Ergun; Bekir-Murat Kaya
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.