Literature DB >> 14698644

Monitoring osteoarthritis progression and therapy.

Maxime Dougados1.   

Abstract

Monitoring the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) and the effects of therapy during clinical trials requires valid and reliable outcome measurements. This paper discusses the selection of outcome measures in Phase III clinical trials of OA, the importance of presenting these variables in terms of the response of individual patients, and the combination of information from several outcome measures into a composite index. Four domains-pain, physical function, patient global assessment, and joint imaging (for studies >;1 year in duration)-have been identified as core outcome measures for Phase III clinical trials of OA. Within the symptom severity domains, several measurement instruments may be considered, including visual analog scales (VAS), the Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, the Lequesne Functional Severity Index, and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). Imaging techniques consist of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or other techniques. Although evaluation of these variables is often based on the average improvement in the study population as a whole, evaluation in terms of individual patients is more relevant. Therefore, continuous data collected from individuals (e.g., pain VAS 0-100mm) require conversion to a dichotomous variable (e.g., improvement yes/no) so that the percentage of responders can be determined. Continuous data from individual patients' data may be converted to a dichotomous variable based on global assessments, statistical modeling, or predictive capacities. Such methods suggest that a change in joint space width of >/=0.5mm may be considered clinically relevant. A composite index combining symptomatic and structural efficacy variables, adverse events, costs, and the requirement for surgery into a single variable would be useful. The requirement for total hip arthroplasty has been evaluated as a composite outcome measure for trials of hip OA and found to be valid, simple, and clinically pertinent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14698644     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  12 in total

Review 1.  Effect of weight reduction in obese patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robin Christensen; Else Marie Bartels; Arne Astrup; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Are joint structure and function related to medial knee OA pain? A pilot study.

Authors:  Rebecca Avrin Zifchock; Yatin Kirane; Howard Hillstrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A 10-day course of SPA therapy is beneficial for people with severe knee osteoarthritis. A 24-week randomised, controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Mine Karagülle; Müfit Zeki Karagülle; Oğuz Karagülle; Arif Dönmez; Mustafa Turan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Role of radiography in predicting progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Max Reijman; J M W Hazes; H A P Pols; R M D Bernsen; B W Koes; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-13

5.  Sample size for prospective studies of hip joint space width narrowing in osteoarthritis by the use of radiographs.

Authors:  Petri Sipola; Lea H Niemitukia; Mika M Hyttinen; Jari P A Arokoski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Early detection and monitoring of cartilage alteration in the experimental meniscectomised guinea pig model of osteoarthritis by 99mTc-NTP 15-5 scintigraphy.

Authors:  Elisabeth Miot-Noirault; Aurélien Vidal; Philippe Pastoureau; Jacques Bonafous; Agnès Chomel; Laurent Sarry; Laurent Audin; Jean-Claude Madelmont; Nicole Moins
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Glucosamine for osteoarthritis: biological effects, clinical efficacy, and safety on glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Juan Salazar; Luis Bello; Mervin Chávez; Roberto Añez; Joselyn Rojas; Valmore Bermúdez
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2014-02-11

8.  The effect of action observation training on knee joint function and gait ability in total knee replacement patients.

Authors:  Seong Doo Park; Hyun Seung Song; Jin Young Kim
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-30

9.  A hierarchy of patient-reported outcomes for meta-analysis of knee osteoarthritis trials: empirical evidence from a survey of high impact journals.

Authors:  Carsten Juhl; Hans Lund; Ewa M Roos; Weiya Zhang; Robin Christensen
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2012-06-26

Review 10.  Harpgophytum procumbens for osteoarthritis and low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joel J Gagnier; Sigrun Chrubasik; Eric Manheimer
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.