Literature DB >> 14698337

Validation of ultrasound contrast destruction imaging for flow quantification.

Olivier Lucidarme1, Yuko Kono, Jacqueline Corbeil, Sang-Hee Choi, Robert F Mattrey.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to validate in vitro a kinetic flow model based on microbubble signal decay curve. Using a 3.5 MHz transducer and phase-inversion (1.8 MHz central transmit frequency), a renal dialysis cartridge oriented vertically was imaged in the transverse plane as 1:1000 dilution of AF0150 was infused at 50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 mL/min. Ten gray-scale images were acquired at each infusion rate using 2.5, 5 and 10 frames/s at 100%, 40%, 15% or 1% of maximum transmit power. Video-intensity measured on each 10 images was fit to a kinetic model using Sigma Plot that yielded microbubble concentration, velocity and destruction per frame. These were correlated with the experimental conditions. At 100% power, video-intensity on the first frame (microbubble concentration at equilibrium) was similar for all flow and frame rates. The model fit the experimental data for all flows at 10 frames/s and for flows lower than 400 and 100 mL/min at 5 frames/s and 2.5 frames/s, respectively. The calculated flow was similar to the experimental flow rates, regardless of technique (r(2) = 0.98). Microbubble fraction destroyed per frame was similar for all flow and frame rates and increased linearly with transmit power (r(2) > 0.98). These results suggest that using appropriate power and frame rate for a given flow rate, estimates of fractional blood volume, flow and destruction fraction can be calculated from the decay curve using 10 frames that can be acquired in 1 to 4 s.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14698337     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00987-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Acoustic techniques for assessing the Optison destruction threshold.

Authors:  Tyrone M Porter; Denise A B Smith; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  An original methodology for quantitative assessment of perfusion in small animal studies using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Sebastien Mulé; Alain De Cesare; Frédérique Frouin; Olivier Lucidarme; Alain Herment
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

5.  Automating tumor classification with pixel-by-pixel contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion kinetics.

Authors:  Casey N Ta; Yuko Kono; Christopher V Barback; Robert F Mattrey; Andrew C Kummel
Journal:  J Vac Sci Technol B Nanotechnol Microelectron       Date:  2012-03-22

Review 6.  Diagnosis of bowel diseases: the role of imaging and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Davide Roccarina; Matteo Garcovich; Maria Elena Ainora; Gianluigi Caracciolo; Francesca Ponziani; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maria Assunta Zocco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Novel use of ultrasound to examine regional blood flow in the mouse kidney.

Authors:  Jennifer C Sullivan; Bin Wang; Erika I Boesen; Gerard D'Angelo; Jennifer S Pollock; David M Pollock
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2009-05-06

8.  Multivariable Dependence of Acoustic Contrast of Fluorocarbon and Xenon Microbubbles under Flow.

Authors:  Rajarshi Chattaraj; Daniel A Hammer; Daeyeon Lee; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.