Literature DB >> 14698334

Accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in uterus volume measurements; comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound.

Cemil Yaman1, Klaus Jesacher, Werner Pölz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to document the accuracy of 3-D uterus volume and to compare it with 2-D measurements. Transvaginal ultrasound (US) examinations were performed in 48 consecutive patients before hysterectomy. The examinations were stored digitally on an internal disk drive for subsequent measurements in virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) program. Immediately after the hysterectomy, the true volume was measured in a water bath. A total of 5 patients were excluded due to difficulty of identifying the borders of their uterus; 8 patients were excluded because of too large fibroids or diffuse hypertrophic enlargement of uterus (volume > 220 mL). Although the volumes estimated by the 3-D method were not significantly different (p = 0.126 first measurement, p = 0.561 second measurement), the volumes estimated by the 2-D method were significantly different (p = 0.005 first measurement, p = 0.012 second measurement). The mean error rates of the two 3-D volume measurements by the same observer were 7.4% and 7.9%, and they were 22.2% and 21.0% for the 2-D volume measurements. It may be concluded that the volume of the uterus can be measured more accurately by 3-D US than by 2-D US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14698334     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)01070-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

1.  The use of inversion mode and 3D manual segmentation in volume measurement of fetal fluid-filled structures: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL).

Authors:  J P Kusanovic; J K Nien; L F Gonçalves; J Espinoza; W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; E Soto; O Erez; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Intraobserver variability in fibroid size measurements: estimated effects on assessing fibroid growth.

Authors:  Malana Moshesh; Shyamal D Peddada; Tracy Cooper; Donna Baird
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Three-dimensional ultrasound as a predictor of pregnancy in patients undergoing ART.

Authors:  Cemil Yaman; Richard Mayer
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

4.  Endometrial thickness and volume by three-dimensional ultrasound one week after embryo transfer to detect pregnancy.

Authors:  Wellington de Paula Martins; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Carolina Oliveira Nastri; Francisco Mauad Filho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Size-dependent Tumor Response to Photodynamic Therapy and Irinotecan Monotherapies Revealed by Longitudinal Ultrasound Monitoring in an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Model.

Authors:  Michael Pigula; Huang-Chiao Huang; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Sriram Anbil; Joyce Liu; Zhiming Mai; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Endometrial thickness and volume by three-dimensional ultrasound one week after embryo transfer to detect pregnancy.

Authors:  Wellington Paula Martins; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Carolina Oliveira Nastri; Francisco Mauad Filho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review.

Authors:  Juan Luis Alcázar
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Estimation of uterine volume: A comparison between Viewpoint and 3D ultrasound estimation in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ishwari Casikar; Max Mongelli; Shannon Reid; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 9.  A review and guide to creating patient specific 3D printed anatomical models from MRI for benign gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Teresa E Flaxman; Carly M Cooke; Olivier X Miguel; Adnan M Sheikh; Sukhbir S Singh
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-07-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.