Literature DB >> 14697461

Usefulness of dipyridamole stress echocardiography for predicting graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Fabio Chirillo1, Andrea Bruni, Alessandro De Leo, Zoran Olivari, Enrico Franceschini-Grisolia, Oscar Totis, Paolo Stritoni.   

Abstract

Noninvasive techniques often provide controversial results in patients who have coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs). Vasodilator stress echocardiography allows semi-simultaneous imaging of CABG flow and segmental left ventricular wall motion. To assess the comparative and additive value of regional flow and function for noninvasive evaluation of graft patency status, we evaluated 110 consecutive patients who underwent CABG and who were scheduled for coronary angiography. All patients underwent stress echocardiography with dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg) and atropine (1 mg), including wall motion analysis by 2-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler evaluation of flow reserve of each CABG. Echocardiographic findings were compared with angiographic data. Four patients had inadequate acoustic windows. The remaining 106 patients had 226 grafts performed. Stress echocardiography showed 67% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and 71% accuracy for identification of 50% to 100% stenosis in the graft or in the recipient coronary vessel. There was a fair agreement with angiography (kappa coefficient 0.60). Identification of impaired coronary bypass flow reserve (i.e., <1.9 for internal mammary grafts and <1.6 for saphenous vein grafts) by Doppler had 91% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 89% accuracy for graft stenosis. There was good agreement with angiographic findings (kappa 0.77). The combination of the 2 techniques achieved 93% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 93% accuracy, showing a very good agreement with the patency status of the grafts as evaluated at angiography (kappa 0.85). The combined assessment of wall motion and flow reserve in patients who underwent CABG is feasible and provides an accurate estimate of graft patency status by increasing sensitivity of stress echocardiography and specificity of Doppler flow reserve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14697461     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve and aortic distensibility indices in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Marcel L Geleijnse; Osama I I Soliman; Folkert J Ten Cate; Miklós Csanády
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Fausto Rigo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 2.062

3.  Dual imaging stress echocardiography versus computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification of patients with chest pain of unknown origin.

Authors:  Quirino Ciampi; Fausto Rigo; Elisabetta Grolla; Eugenio Picano; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 4.  Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andreas Seraphim; Kristopher D Knott; Joao B Augusto; Katia Menacho; Sara Tyebally; Benjamin Dowsing; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Leon J Menezes; Daniel A Jones; Rakesh Uppal; James C Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.