Literature DB >> 14697442

Optimization of MammoSite therapy.

Melvin A Astrahan1, Gabor Jozsef, Oscar E Streeter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiation source anisotropy causes about 10% of a spherically shaped planning target volume surrounding a MammoSite balloon to receive less than the prescribed dose. The principal dose-limiting factor for MammoSite therapy is the dose to the overlying skin. Additional limiting factors potentially include the dose to portions of the heart and lung. The goal of optimization is to deliver the prescribed dose to as much of the planning target volume as possible while avoiding toxicity to adjacent organs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An experimental CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning system was used to investigate optimization strategies for MammoSite treatment. This system implements a linear optimization of high-dose-rate dwell times on the basis of constraints assigned to points of interest and a set of potential dwell positions.
RESULTS: The cylindrical symmetry of the MammoSite catheter limits the optimization process to creating spherical, ellipsoidal, or egg-shaped isodose distributions whose major axis is oriented along the catheter axis. If the dose to a limiting structure, such as skin, is not an issue, the use of multiple dwell positions can compensate for source anisotropy and create a more spherical isodose surface enclosing the planning target volume compared with a single dwell position. When skin becomes a dose-limiting factor, the catheter axis orientation, source anisotropy, dwell position, and dwell weighting can be exploited to limit the skin dose while simultaneously preserving the prescribed dose to as much of the target volume as possible.
CONCLUSION: Optimization of MammoSite therapy using multiple dwell positions within the balloon is both possible and practical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14697442     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)01458-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

Review 1.  Update on accelerated partial-breast irradiation.

Authors:  Alphonse G Taghian; Abram Recht
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Dosimetric impact of source-positioning uncertainty in high-dose-rate balloon brachytherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-10-29

3.  Evaluation of the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; E Day Werts; Mark G Trombetta; Moyed Miften
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Comparison of single and multiple dwell position methods in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; Mark G Trombetta; Moyed Miften
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dose volume histogram analysis of normal structures associated with accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered by high dose rate brachytherapy and comparison with whole breast external beam radiotherapy fields.

Authors:  Alexandra J Stewart; Desmond A O'Farrell; Robert A Cormack; Jorgen L Hansen; Atif J Khan; Subhakar Mutyala; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Inherent change in MammoSite applicator three-dimensional geometry over time.

Authors:  Subhakar Mutyala; Walter Choi; Atif J Khan; Ravi Yaparpalvi; Alexandra J Stewart; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Dose optimization of breast balloon brachytherapy using a stepping 192Ir HDR source.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Choi; Sung-Joon Ye; E Ishmael Parsai; Sui Shen; Ruby Meredith; Ivan A Brezovich; Roger Ove
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Dosimetric evaluation of multilumen intracavitary balloon applicator rotation in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; Mark G Trombetta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Brachytherapy treatment planning commissioning: effect of the election of proper bibliography and finite size of TG-43 input data on standard treatments.

Authors:  Christian N Valdés; Gustavo H Píriz; Enrrique Lozano
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.