Literature DB >> 14697180

[Pre-malignant and malignant lesions in minor surgery at a health centre. Appearances can't be trusted].

C González Anguren1, R Osés Primo, R Molinero Pinilla, A Parra Osés, S de la Red Arroyo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of the malignant and pre-malignant lesions found in the minor surgical interventions performed at a health centre.
DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive study. PARTICIPANTS: 682 lesions: all the lesions extirpated and referred to pathology except for epidermal and trichilemmal cysts, lipomas, molluscum, common warts, and nails.
SETTING: Rochapea Health Centre, Pamplona.Main measurements. We analysed the anatomical-pathological results and the distribution by sex, age-group, location, technique and edges affected in 27 dysplasias and 11 malignant lesions.
RESULTS: We found that malignant and pre-malignant lesions were more common in women, aged 15 to 44 for dysplasias and 45-64 for malignant lesions. The most common location was on the back; the most frequent technique, fusiform excision. This technique had the highest percentage of edges without lesion in dysplasias. The lesions whose edges were affected corresponded to punch and circular excision samples. None of the malignant lesions had their edges affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Most malignant lesions are not suspected. They appear in samples referred with a diagnosis of benign. Employment of techniques such as fusiform excision in lesions which are potentially malign, even though in principle they seem benign, enables them to be extirpated with free edges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14697180      PMCID: PMC7681865          DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)79334-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  16 in total

1.  [Quality of minor surgery in primary care. Are current indicators adequate?].

Authors:  J Menárguez Puche; P Alcántara Muñoz
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Is histological examination of tissue removed by general practitioners always necessary? Before and after comparison of detection rates of serious skin lesions.

Authors:  A Lowy; D Willis; K Abrams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-16

3.  Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners.

Authors:  L J McWilliam; F Knox; N Wilkinson; P Oogarah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

4.  Melanoma excision by general practitioners in north-east Thames region, England.

Authors:  S M Khorshid; E Pinney; J A Bishop
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  General practitioners as providers of minor surgery--a success story?

Authors:  J S Brown; R R Smith; T Cantor; D Chesover; R Yearsley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Diagnosis of malignant melanoma by general practitioners and hospital specialists.

Authors:  A M Jackson; D R Morgan; R Ellison
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  [Skin neoplasms in general practice].

Authors:  E Lyngset; S Hunskår
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2001-08-20

8.  Profile of the malignant melanoma excised in general practice.

Authors:  M M Bosch; M E Boon
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Excision biopsy of malignant melanoma by general practitioners in south east Scotland 1982-91.

Authors:  R M Herd; J A Hunter; K M McLaren; U Chetty; A C Watson; J M Gollock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-12-12

10.  General practitioners' accuracy in diagnosing skin cancers.

Authors:  Annamaria Offidani; Oriana Simonetti; Maria Luisa Bernardini; Ayhan Alpagut; Andreina Cellini; Guido Bossi
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.366

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.