Literature DB >> 14696665

Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.

Thomas Fortin1, Jean Luc Bosson, Jean Loup Coudert, Michel Isidori.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the planning software of an image-guided implant placement system based on a mechanical device coupled with a template stabilized on soft tissue during surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive partially or completely edentulous patients were treated with the image-guided system. For each patient, a study prosthesis was fabricated and duplicated in acrylic resin and served as a scanning template. Axial images were obtained from a computerized tomographic scan and transferred to planning software that provides real 3-dimensional information to plan implant position. Once the final position of the implant was defined, preoperative data such as the size of implants and anatomic complications were recorded using the planning software. The scanning template was then drilled in that exact position by a drilling machine. During surgery, the drilled template was used as a drill guide. After implant placement, intraoperative data were recorded and statistically compared with the preoperative data using the Kendall correlation coefficient for qualitative data and the Kappa concordance coefficient for quantitative data.
RESULTS: Agreement between the preoperative and intraoperative data was high for both implant size and anatomic complications. The Kendall correlation coefficient was 0.8 for the diameter and 0.82 for the length. The Kappa concordance coefficient was 0.87 for both dehiscence and bone graft, 0.88 for osteotomy, and 1.0 for fenestration. DISCUSSION: In the few instances where planning was not perfect, implant placement was completed in a clinically acceptable manner.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the image-guided system presented is reliable for the preoperative assessment of implant size and anatomic complications. It may also be reliable for flapless surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14696665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Oral Implant Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Sarika Gupta; Neelkant Patil; Jitender Solanki; Ravinder Singh; Sanjeev Laller
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 May-Jun

2.  Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures.

Authors:  Nadine Marheineke; Uta Scherer; Martin Rücker; Constantin von See; Björn Rahlf; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Marcus Stoetzer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Condò; L Ottria; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-25

4.  Guided implant surgery on oral cancer patients: in vitro study.

Authors:  Marion Paris; Anne-Gaëlle Chaux-Bodard; René Gourmet; Thomas Fortin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Guided implant surgery with modification of the technique involving the raising of a semicircular miniflap: a preliminary study.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha; José Viña; Laura Maestre; David Peñarrocha; José Balaguer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template.

Authors:  Shin-Young Youk; Jee-Ho Lee; Ji-Man Park; Seong-Joo Heo; Hyun-Ki Roh; Eun-Jin Park; Im Hee Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Accuracy of computer-assisted implant placement with insertion templates.

Authors:  Eleni Naziri; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-05-13

8.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Two Implant Placement Techniques in Sinus Region (Bone Graft versus Computer-Aided Implant Surgery): A Randomized Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Ghazwan Almahrous; Sandra David-Tchouda; Aboubacar Sissoko; Nathalie Rancon; Jean-Luc Bosson; Thomas Fortin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Relationship of central incisor implant placement to the ridge configuration anterior to the nasopalatine canal in dentate and partially edentulous individuals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Xueting Jia; Wenjie Hu; Huanxin Meng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides.

Authors:  Tabea Flügge; Wiebe Derksen; Jobine Te Poel; Bassam Hassan; Katja Nelson; Daniel Wismeijer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.977

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.