Literature DB >> 14696227

Synovitis and soft tissue impingement of the ankle: assessment with enhanced three-dimensional FSPGR MR imaging.

Yong-Min Huh1, Jin-Suck Suh, Jin-Woo Lee, Ho-Taek Song.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess soft tissue impingement as well as synovitis of the ankle associated with trauma by using contrast-enhanced (CE), fat-suppressed, three-dimensional, fast gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state with radiofrequency spoiling (FSPGR) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients who had had chronic ankle pain associated with a traumatic injury undertook fat-suppressed CE three-dimensional FSPGR MR imaging and then arthroscopy of the ankle. The ankle joint was divided into four compartments by anatomic details: the anterolateral gutter, anteromedial gutter, anterior recess, and posterior recess. Synovial enhancement was graded as follows: grade I, no enhancement; grade II, linear enhancement; grade III, focal nodular enhancement; and grade IV, irregular nodular enhancement. MR grading of the synovial enhancement (synovitis, grade III or IV; soft tissue impingement, grade III or IV with its intrusion from the capsular reflection) was compared with arthroscopic findings. A control study of twenty asymptomatic ankles was done for determining enhancement. Arthroscopy confirmed synovitis in 47 compartments of 27 patients. Of the 27 patients, 15 revealed soft tissue impingement in 17 compartments.
RESULTS: For the assessment of synovitis, fat-suppressed CE three-dimensional FSPGR MR imaging had an accuracy of 72.9%, sensitivity of 91.5%, and specificity of 63.9%; whereas for that of soft tissue impingement it had an accuracy of 94.4%, sensitivity of 76.5%, and specificity of 96.9%. All of the asymptomatic subjects showed grade I (81%) or II (19%) synovial enhancement.
CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed CE three-dimensional FSPGR MR imaging was sensitive for the evaluation of synovitis of the ankle associated with trauma, whereas it was specific for soft tissue impingement evaluation. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14696227     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

1.  The role of popliteal lymph nodes in differentiating rheumatoid arthritis from osteoarthritis by using CE 3D FSPGR MR imaging: relationship of the inflamed synovial volume.

Authors:  Yong-Min Huh; Sungjun Kim; Jin-Suck Suh; Ho- Taek Song; Kijun Song; Kyoo-Ho Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Ankle impingement syndromes: an imaging review.

Authors:  Zachary Berman; Monica Tafur; Sonya S Ahmed; Brady K Huang; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Arthroscopic debridement for soft tissue ankle impingement.

Authors:  S A Brennan; F Rahim; J Dowling; S R Kearns
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Double-inversion recovery with synthetic magnetic resonance: a pilot study for assessing synovitis of the knee joint compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jisook Yi; Young Han Lee; Ho-Taek Song; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Ankle impingement.

Authors:  Kyle P Lavery; Kevin J McHale; William H Rossy; George Theodore
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Ankle MRI for anterolateral soft tissue impingement: increased accuracy with the use of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D-FSPGR MRI.

Authors:  Hye Jung Choo; Jin-Suck Suh; Sung-Jun Kim; Yong-Min Huh; Myung In Kim; Jin-Woo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.