Literature DB >> 14696161

Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases.

David J R Hildick-Smith1, John T Walsh, Martin D Lowe, Leonard M Shapiro, Michael C Petch.   

Abstract

The transradial approach to coronary angiography is considered by some to be a route of choice, by others to be a route that should be used only where there are relative contraindications to the femoral approach. We present the largest series to date of patients in whom transradial coronary angiography was undertaken specifically because of contraindications to the femoral approach. Since 1995, patients at this cardiothoracic center have been considered for a transradial approach to coronary angiography if there were relative contraindications to the femoral route. Data from 500 patients was prospectively collected. Patients were aged 66 +/- 9 years; 72% were male. Indications for the radial approach included peripheral vascular disease (305), therapeutic anticoagulation (77), musculoskeletal (59), and morbid obesity (32). Sixty-eight patients (14%) required a radial procedure following a failed femoral approach. Access was right radial 291 (58%), left radial 209 (42%). Eighteen operators were involved, but two operators undertook 355 (71%) of the cases. Catheter gauge was 6 Fr (n = 243; 49%), 5 Fr (219; 43%), and 4 Fr (29; 6%). The procedure was successful in 463 cases [92.6%; 88.2% for nonmajority vs. 94.4% (P < 0.05) for the two majority operators]. Success in males (93.6%) significantly exceeded that in females (90.1%; P < 0.05). In-catheter-laboratory duration was 45 +/- 17 min; fluoroscopy time, 7.5 +/- 6 min; radiation dose, 40 +/- 23 CGy. The procedure was without incident in 408 cases (82%). There were procedural difficulties in 18% of cases, including radial artery spasm (12%) and vasovagal response (5%). The incidence was higher with 6 Fr catheters (23%) than with 5/4 Fr (15%; P < 0.05). Major procedural complications occurred in three cases: brachial artery dissection in one and cardiac arrest in two. Postprocedure major vascular complications numbered three: claudicant pain on handgrip in one, ischemic index finger (with subsequent terminal phalanx amputation due to osteomyelitis) in one, and ischemic hand for 4 hr in one. Patients with contraindications to the femoral approach form a high-risk group. In these patients, transradial cardiac catheterization can be performed successfully and with a low risk of major complications. Minor adverse features remain frequent, occurring in one in five cases, though difficulties are minimized both with increasing operator experience and smaller sheath diameter. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14696161     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  12 in total

1.  Multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with a type B aortic dissection-transradial or transfemoral?

Authors:  Tahir Hamid; Tawfiq R Choudhury; Doug Fraser
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-26

2.  Efficacy of transradial cerebral angiography in the elderly.

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Park; Dae-Yong Kim; Jin-Wook Kim; Yong-Seok Park; Won-Bae Seung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 3.  Coronary revascularisation in women.

Authors:  G W Mikhail
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Feasibility of the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jang Young Kim; Junghan Yoon; Hyun Sook Jung; Ji Yeon Ko; Byung Su Yoo; Sung Oh Hwang; Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Hoon Choe
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 5.  Transradial approach to cardiovascular interventions: an update.

Authors:  Shilpa Sachdeva; Sibu Saha
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-06

6.  Eutectic mixture of local anesthesia cream can reduce both the radial pain and sympathetic response during transradial coronary angiography.

Authors:  Young Jin Youn; Woo-Taek Kim; Jun-Won Lee; Sung-Gyun Ahn; Min-Soo Ahn; Jang-Young Kim; Byung-Su Yoo; Seung-Hwan Lee; Junghan Yoon; Kyung-Hoon Choe
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Marc Vorpahl; Till Koehler; Jason Foerst; Spyridon Panagiotopoulos; Heinrich Schleiting; Klaus Koss; Gunda Ziegler; Hilmar Brinkmann; Melchior Seyfarth; Klaus Tiroch
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Revealing the impact of local access-site complications and upper extremity dysfunction post transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.

Authors:  E M Zwaan; A G M M Koopman; C A J Holtzer; F Zijlstra; M J P F Ritt; G Amoroso; E Moerman; M J M Kofflard; A A J IJsselmuiden
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Predictive Factors for Access-Site Pain Chronicity after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Radial Artery Access.

Authors:  Liuda Brogiene; Giedre Baksyte; Agne Klimaite; Martynas Paliokas; Andrius Macas
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.037

10.  Feasibility and utility of transradial cerebral angiography: experience during the learning period.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Kim; Yong Sung Park; Chul Gu Chung; Kyeong Sug Park; Dong Jin Chung; Hyun Jin Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.