Anna Westerståhl1, Cecilia Björkelund. 1. Department of Primary Health Care, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden. anna.westerstahl@allmed.gu.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reflect on and further understand mechanisms of heteronormativity in the consultation, with special focus on the relative invisibility of lesbian women. DESIGN: Tape-recorded focus group interviews transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative methods. SETTING: General practitioners (GPs) from the city of Göteborg, Sweden, who had formerly answered a postal questionnaire about lesbian women in the consultation, were invited to take part in subsequent focus groups. SUBJECTS: Ten GPs from the questionnaire who accepted the invitation and volunteered to participate in focus groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A discourse analytical approach using interaction regarding consensus and disagreement between informants in creating major and minor themes. RESULTS: Consultation skills were forwarded as a major tool in receiving optimal information from patients. However, traditional concepts of family and sexuality restricted information and hampered an accepting attitude. Bringing up issues of sexual identity/orientation was left to the lesbian patient and strongly related to her reason for attending. CONCLUSION: Consultation skills are a useful but not sufficient means of making lesbian women visible in the doctor-patient relationship. Doctors also need to transcend traditional concepts of family and sexuality and reflect on what is a relevant issue from the patient's perspective.
OBJECTIVE: To reflect on and further understand mechanisms of heteronormativity in the consultation, with special focus on the relative invisibility of lesbian women. DESIGN: Tape-recorded focus group interviews transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative methods. SETTING: General practitioners (GPs) from the city of Göteborg, Sweden, who had formerly answered a postal questionnaire about lesbian women in the consultation, were invited to take part in subsequent focus groups. SUBJECTS: Ten GPs from the questionnaire who accepted the invitation and volunteered to participate in focus groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A discourse analytical approach using interaction regarding consensus and disagreement between informants in creating major and minor themes. RESULTS: Consultation skills were forwarded as a major tool in receiving optimal information from patients. However, traditional concepts of family and sexuality restricted information and hampered an accepting attitude. Bringing up issues of sexual identity/orientation was left to the lesbian patient and strongly related to her reason for attending. CONCLUSION: Consultation skills are a useful but not sufficient means of making lesbian women visible in the doctor-patient relationship. Doctors also need to transcend traditional concepts of family and sexuality and reflect on what is a relevant issue from the patient's perspective.