Literature DB >> 14695020

The context of sexual violence: situational predictors of self-protective actions.

Jody Clay-Warner1.   

Abstract

While considerable research has examined the relative effectiveness of different types of self-protective actions in rape avoidance, little research has considered how the situational context of the assault affects women's choice of self-protective strategy. Through an examination of data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, this article examines the extent to which situational factors are independently related to the use of physical resistance, verbal resistance, as well as to lack of resistance. The results of the multinominal logistic regression analysis indicate that those who used verbal self-protective action were more likely to have been attacked at night, threatened with a weapon, and to be assaulted by a prior or current romantic partner than were those who chose physical resistance. Those attacked by a current or former intimate were also more likely to employ no resistance than they were physical resistance. Victims facing a substance-using assailant, however, were more likely to enact physical self-protection than to employ no resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14695020     DOI: 10.1891/vivi.2003.18.5.543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Vict        ISSN: 0886-6708


  3 in total

1.  Victim-Offender Relationship Status Moderates the Relationships of Peritraumatic Emotional Responses, Active Resistance, and Posttraumatic Stress Symptomatology in Female Rape Survivors.

Authors:  Brian A Feinstein; Kathryn L Humphreys; Michelle J Bovin; Brian P Marx; Patricia A Resick
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2011-06-01

2.  Do Men Use More Sexually Aggressive Tactics When Intoxicated? A Within-Person Examination of Naturally Occurring Episodes of Sex.

Authors:  Maria Testa; Whitney C Brown; Weijun Wang
Journal:  Psychol Violence       Date:  2019-09

3.  Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version of Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale.

Authors:  Rengin Güvenç; Münevver Hacioğlu Yildirim; Ejder Akgün Yildirim
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.066

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.