Literature DB >> 14694999

Impact of long-acting growth factors on practice dynamics and patient satisfaction.

Roy A Beveridge1, Robert M Rifkin, Ronald J Moleski, Gary Milkovich, John F Reitan, Thomas A Paivanas, R Jake Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify time expended, patient satisfaction, and econometrics associated with short-acting (sargramostim, epoetin alfa) and long-acting (darbepoetin alfa, pegfilgrastim) growth factors.
DESIGN: Retrospective resource utilization and prospective two-phase observational study.
METHODS: During week 1, time-motion measurements related to patient treatment and drug preparation were collected for scheduling; check-in; phlebotomy; laboratory; and drug preparation, administration, and recording. Drug utilization for one chemotherapy cycle during weeks 2 and 3 was assessed for sargramostim, pegfilgrastim, epoetin alfa, darbepoetin alfa, sargramostim plus epoetin alfa, and pegfilgrastim plus darbepoetin alfa. Patients completed a satisfaction survey.
RESULTS: Among 140 patients (mean age 58 yrs), mean chemotherapy cycle duration was 19 days. A total of 268 events were observed. Mean total staff time/patient visit for drug administration was 22.1 minutes, with most time spent on scheduling (5.5 min) and drug preparation, administration, recording (5.2 min). For sargramostim only versus pegfilgrastim only, pegfilgrastim resulted in a 37% reduction (p < 0.01) in all visits and an 85% reduction (p < 0.01) in mean number of doses. For epoetin alfa only versus darbepoetin alfa only, darbepoetin alfa resulted in a 48% reduction (p < 0.01) in mean number of doses. The most common dosage of epoetin alfa was 40,000 U/week (63.6%) and that of darbepoetin alfa was 200 microg every other week (92%), but complete blood counts were obtained weekly. For pegfilgrastim plus darbepoetin alfa versus sargramostim plus epoetin alfa, a 45% reduction (p < 0.01) in total visits and a 77% reduction (p < 0.01) in mean number of doses were noted in the former group. In 69 patients converted to long-acting drugs, 65 actual hours for a single treatment cycle were saved. For patients receiving pegfilgrastim plus darbepoetin alfa, there was a 45% reduction in total clinic visits, 77% reduction in doses, and staff time savings of 1.9 hours/patient/cycle of chemotherapy. Fifty-four patients completed the survey and trended toward neutral in their responses, with moderate disagreement that receiving injections is painful.
CONCLUSION: Long-acting growth factors resulted in significant time savings for staff and providers by reducing the number of necessary office visits for drug administration. These time savings can significantly improve the quality of life for patients, as well as nurses, physicians, and caregivers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14694999     DOI: 10.1592/phco.23.16.101s.31971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  7 in total

1.  Resource utilisation and time commitment associated with correction of anaemia in cancer patients using epoetin alfa.

Authors:  Kenneth R Meehan; N Simon Tchekmedyian; Robert E Smith; Joel Kallich
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Phase I/II randomised study of a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (AMG 114) for the treatment of anaemia with concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Richard de Boer; Michael Clemens; Gabor Renczes; Dusan Kotasek; Jana Prausova; Norbert Marschner; Michael Hedenus; Sameer Doshi; Lisa Hendricks; Anders C Österborg
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Economic evaluation of weekly epoetin alfa versus biweekly darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anaemia: evidence from a 16-week randomised trial.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Jasmina I Radeva; Davey B Daniel; Samir H Mody; Jamie B Forlenza; R Scott McKenzie; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Development and content validation of the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (SEQ-G-CSF).

Authors:  Aylin Yucel; Anne Skalicky; Olabimpe Ruth Eseyin; Emre Yucel; Rajesh Belani; Mark Bensink
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-18

5.  Staff time and motion assessment for administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a two-phase pilot study in clinical oncology practices.

Authors:  John F Reitan; Arletta van Breda; Patricia K Corey-Lisle; Sanatan Shreay; Ze Cong; Jason Legg
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Practice Patterns in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia (CIA) Treated at Hospital Oncology Clinics.

Authors:  John F Reitan; Arletta van Breda; Sanatan Shreay; Patricia K Corey-Lisle; Ze Cong
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-02

7.  Is PEGylated G-CSF superior to G-CSF in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Huan Zheng; Man-Cheng Yu; Wei Wang; Xin-Hong Wu; Dong-Mei Yang; Juan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.