Literature DB >> 14694173

Factors that affect postdialysis rebound in serum urea concentration, including the rate of dialysis: results from the HEMO Study.

John T Daugirdas1, Tom Greene, Thomas A Depner, John Leypoldt, Frank Gotch, Gerald Schulman, Robert Star.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that postdialysis urea rebound is related to K/V, the rate of dialysis, but a systematic analysis of factors that affect rebound has not been reported. With the use of 30-min and, in a subset, 60-min postdialysis samples, postdialysis urea rebound was measured to (1) determine how well previously proposed equations based on the rate of dialysis (K/V) predict rebound in a large sample of patients with varying characteristics, (2) determine whether other factors besides K/V affect rebound, and (3) estimate more precise values for coefficients in prediction equations for rebound. Rebound was calculated relative to both immediate and 20-s postdialysis samples to study early components of rebound unrelated to access recirculation. The equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) computed by fitting the two-pool variable volume model to the 30-min postdialysis sample agreed well with eKt/V based on the 60-min postdialysis sample. Using the pre-, post-, and 30-min postdialysis samples for 1245 patients with arteriovenous (AV) accesses, the median intercompartmental mass transfer coefficient (Kc) was 797 ml/min for rebound computed relative to the 20-s postdialysis samples and 592 ml/min relative to the immediate postdialysis samples. K/V was the strongest predictor of rebound among 22 factors considered. Other factors associated with greater rebound for 1331 patients using AV accesses or venous catheters included access type, black race, male gender, absence of congestive heart failure, greater age, ultrafiltration rate, and low predialysis or intradialysis systolic BP. Equations of the form eKt/V = single-pool Kt/V - B x (K/V) were fit to the data. With AV access, the optimum values for the slope term (B) were 0.39 and 0.46 (in h(-1)) for single-pool Kt/V calculated based on 20-s postdialysis or immediate postdialysis samples, respectively. For patients using venous catheters, the respective values for B were 0.22 and 0.29. Postdialysis urea rebound can be predicted with acceptable accuracy from a postdialysis sample using a zero-intercept, K/V-based rate equation. Several patient or treatment-specific factors predict enhanced or reduced rebound. Rate equation slope coefficients for K/V of 0.39 (AV access) and 0.22 (venous access) are proposed when a 15- to 20-s slow-flow method is used to draw the postdialysis blood. Slightly higher K/V slope coefficients (0.46 and 0.29, respectively) should be used if a shorter (e.g., 10 s) slow-flow period is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14694173     DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000103871.20736.0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  13 in total

1.  Modeled urea distribution volume and mortality in the HEMO Study.

Authors:  John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; Thomas A Depner; Nathan W Levin; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Nathan W Levin; Gerald J Beck; Thomas A Depner; Paul W Eggers; Jennifer J Gassman; Irina Gorodetskaya; Tom Greene; Sam James; Brett Larive; Robert M Lindsay; Ravindra L Mehta; Brent Miller; Daniel B Ornt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Anjay Rastogi; Michael V Rocco; Brigitte Schiller; Olga Sergeyeva; Gerald Schulman; George O Ting; Mark L Unruh; Robert A Star; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Improved equation for estimating single-pool Kt/V at higher dialysis frequencies.

Authors:  John T Daugirdas; John Ken Leypoldt; Alp Akonur; Tom Greene; Thomas A Depner
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Can rescaling dose of dialysis to body surface area in the HEMO study explain the different responses to dose in women versus men?

Authors:  John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; Glenn M Chertow; Thomas A Depner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Reduction of carbamylated albumin by extended hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Sahir Kalim; Ron Wald; Marc B Goldstein; Andrew T Yan; Nazanin Noori; Mercedeh Kiaii; Julia Wenger; Christopher Chan; Ravi I Thadhani; S Ananth Karumanchi; Anders H Berg
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 1.812

7.  Dialysis cannot be dosed.

Authors:  Timothy W Meyer; Tammy L Sirich; Thomas H Hostetter
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 8.  Chronic Hemodialysis Therapy in the West.

Authors:  Michael V Rocco
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-18

9.  The effects of frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Nocturnal Trial.

Authors:  Michael V Rocco; Robert S Lockridge; Gerald J Beck; Paul W Eggers; Jennifer J Gassman; Tom Greene; Brett Larive; Christopher T Chan; Glenn M Chertow; Michael Copland; Christopher D Hoy; Robert M Lindsay; Nathan W Levin; Daniel B Ornt; Andreas Pierratos; Mary F Pipkin; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John B Stokes; Mark L Unruh; Robert A Star; Alan S Kliger; A Kliger; P Eggers; J Briggs; T Hostetter; A Narva; R Star; B Augustine; P Mohr; G Beck; Z Fu; J Gassman; T Greene; J Daugirdas; L Hunsicker; B Larive; M Li; J Mackrell; K Wiggins; S Sherer; B Weiss; S Rajagopalan; J Sanz; S Dellagrottaglie; M Kariisa; T Tran; J West; M Unruh; R Keene; J Schlarb; C Chan; M McGrath-Chong; R Frome; H Higgins; S Ke; O Mandaci; C Owens; C Snell; G Eknoyan; L Appel; A Cheung; A Derse; C Kramer; N Geller; R Grimm; L Henderson; S Prichard; E Roecker; M Rocco; B Miller; J Riley; R Schuessler; R Lockridge; M Pipkin; C Peterson; C Hoy; A Fensterer; D Steigerwald; J Stokes; D Somers; A Hilkin; K Lilli; W Wallace; B Franzwa; E Waterman; C Chan; M McGrath-Chong; M Copland; A Levin; L Sioson; E Cabezon; S Kwan; D Roger; R Lindsay; R Suri; J Champagne; R Bullas; A Garg; A Mazzorato; E Spanner; M Rocco; J Burkart; S Moossavi; V Mauck; T Kaufman; A Pierratos; W Chan; K Regozo; S Kwok
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  A novel method to rapidly calculate the urea clearance index and urea reduction rate based on parameters obtained during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Jia Chen; Wei Wang; Yu-Mei Zhang; Wen-Ge Li
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.