Literature DB >> 14693130

EXAFS study of mercury(II) sorption to Fe- and Al-(hydr)oxides. II. Effects of chloride and sulfate.

Christopher S Kim1, James J Rytuba, Gordon E Brown.   

Abstract

Common complexing ligands such as chloride and sulfate can significantly impact the sorption of Hg(II) to particle surfaces in aqueous environmental systems. To examine the effects of these ligands on Hg(II) sorption to mineral sorbents, macroscopic Hg(II) uptake measurements were conducted at pH 6 and [Hg](i)=0.5 mM on goethite (alpha-FeOOH), gamma-alumina (gamma-Al(2)O(3)), and bayerite (beta-Al(OH)(3)) in the presence of chloride or sulfate, and the sorption products were characterized by extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. The presence of chloride resulted in reduced uptake of Hg(II) on all three substrates over the Cl(-) concentration ([Cl(-)]) range 10(-5) to 10(-2) M, lowering Hg surface coverages on goethite, gamma-alumina, and bayerite from 0.42 to 0.07 micromol/m(2), 0.06 to 0.006 micromol/m(2), and 0.55 to 0.39 micromol/m(2) ([Cl(-)]=10(-5) to 10(-3) M only), respectively. This reduction in Hg(II) uptake is primarily a result of the formation of stable, nonsorbing aqueous HgCl(2) complexes in solution, limiting the amount of free Hg(II) available to sorb. At higher [Cl(-)] beam reduction of Hg(II) to Hg(I) was observed, resulting in the possible formation of aqueous Hg(2)Cl(2) species and the precipitation of calomel, Hg(2)Cl(2(s)). The presence of sulfate caused enhanced Hg(II) uptake over the sulfate concentration ([SO(4)(2-)]) range 10(-5) to 0.9 M, increasing Hg surface coverages on goethite, gamma-alumina, and bayerite from 0.39 to 0.45 micromol/m(2), 0.11 to 0.38 micromol/m(2), and 0.36 to 3.33 micromol/m(2), respectively. This effect is likely due to the direct sorption or accumulation of sulfate ions at the substrate interface, effectively reducing the positive surface charge that electrostatically inhibits Hg(II) sorption. Spectroscopic evidence for ternary surface complexation was observed in isolated cases, specifically in the Hg-goethite-sulfate system at high [SO(4)(2-)] and in the Hg-goethite-chloride system.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 14693130     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0021-9797            Impact factor:   8.128


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of mercury adsorption at the gibbsite-water interface using the CD-MUSIC model.

Authors:  Chang Min Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mechanism of Hg(II) Immobilization in Sediments by Sulfate-Cement Amendment.

Authors:  Susana Serrano; Dimitri Vlassopoulos; Peggy A O'Day
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Immobilization of Hg(II) by coprecipitation in sulfate-cement systems.

Authors:  Susana Serrano; Dimitri Vlassopoulos; Brad Bessinger; Peggy A O'Day
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Zn(II) and Cu(II) adsorption and retention onto iron oxyhydroxide nanoparticles: effects of particle aggregation and salinity.

Authors:  Rebecca B Chesne; Christopher S Kim
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.737

5.  Mercury Removal from Contaminated Water by Wood-Based Biochar Depends on Natural Organic Matter and Ionic Composition.

Authors:  Sampriti Chaudhuri; Gabriel Sigmund; Sharon E Bone; Naresh Kumar; Thilo Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Fe, Rather Than Soil Organic Matter, as a Controlling Factor of Hg Distribution in Subsurface Forest Soil in an Iron Mining Area.

Authors:  Rui Qu; Guilin Han; Man Liu; Kunhua Yang; Xiaoqiang Li; Jinke Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.