Literature DB >> 14692572

Communicating anthrax in 2001: a comparison of CDC information and print media accounts.

Felicia Mebane1, Sarah Temin, Claudia F Parvanta.   

Abstract

Information about anthrax released by news media from October 4 to December 3, 2001, was identified, sampled, coded, and compared with information released by CDC during that period using statistical analysis. In addition, communications about two anthrax-related issues were examined in depth. The quantitative analysis showed that, overall, CDC information releases and news coverage tracked fairly closely. When weight was defined as number of mentions, both sources gave the same weight to reports of risk for the population. The news sample gave roughly half the weight as CDC to who was exposed, how people were exposed, and what role antibiotics play in preventing anthrax. The samples were widely divergent (CDC high, news sample low) for public health precautions and other details. The in-depth, qualitative analysis showed that some reporters misinterpreted information provided by CDC, but they responded to requests to clarify the issue. The findings of this study suggest ways to improve future crisis communication efforts and demonstrate how differing methods of analysis can yield substantially different conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14692572     DOI: 10.1080/713851970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  7 in total

1.  Facilitation of risk communication during the anthrax attacks of 2001: the organizational backstory.

Authors:  Caron Chess; Lee Clarke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Newspaper coverage of implementation of the Michigan smoke-free law: lessons learned.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuiper; Kate E Frantz; Molly Cotant; Stephen Babb; Jerelyn Jordan; Matthew Phelan
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 3.  A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Emergency Risk Communications.

Authors:  Elena Savoia; Leesa Lin; Gaya M Gamhewage
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Journalists' views about reporting avian influenza and a potential pandemic: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Hooker; Catherine King; Julie Leask
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Perception of spokespersons' performance and characteristics in crisis communication: experience of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shu-Yu Lyu; Ruey-Yu Chen; Shih-fan Steve Wang; Ya-Ling Weng; Eugene Yu-Chang Peng; Ming-Been Lee
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  The initial hospital response to an epidemic.

Authors:  Nicola Petrosillo; Vincenzo Puro; Antonino Di Caro; Giuseppe Ippolito
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  [Successes and failures in the management of public health crisis in Spain].

Authors:  Juan Gérvas; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 2.139

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.